Please tutor me on some integrated amp basics.


I’ve recently purchased Magico A3 speakers and a VPI Classic 2 SE turntable with an Ortofon Black 2M moving magnet cartridge. I have a Marantz SA 8005 CD/SACD player to play the few (maybe a hundred or so) CD’s in my possession.
I’ve mostly vinyl albums and no streaming sources. I’m next going to upgrade my old amp/preamp purchased back in the late 70’s with a new, probably integrated, one and am starting to do some research.

Here’s where I need some tutoring. A lot has changed since the seventies with the advent of digital technology. As well as I need to learn more about amplification components in the high end of audio technology. I keep running across terms I don’t understand. I’ll give you a list and if someone would be kind enough to explain these basics I’d be obliged.

For instance I was reading about the Hegel H360 integrated amp that Magico’s Alon Wolf recommended for their A3’s. The review mentioned they were a Class A/B amp, another person commented Class A’s were better, and a third person said he didn’t care for Class D amps. What do these classes signify? 

A second question is about DACs. I generally understand their purpose of the DAC, converting a digital to an analog signal. However my only digital device, the Marantz SA 8005 already has a DAC, ostensibly of good quality. The turntable ’s Ortofon cartridge would not need to play through a DAC, I presume. Would I bypass the CD’s players DAC if I purchase the higher quality Hegel H360 integrated amp?. Or could I find an equivalent integrated amp without an integral DAC?

On the other side of the equation I understand the turntable’s cartridge cannot play through the Hegel without first going through a phono stage. My old Phase Linear 4000 preamp you just plugged the turntables RCA cables into the back of the preamp and you were done. What’s that about? Do they make equivalent integrated amps to the Hegel H360 with integrated phono stages already in place, so I can just plug my turntable in as I’ve been able to do before. The amps don’t seem to be well integrated at all if you have to add a pricey phono stage to make them work, and end up having an extra DAC. That’s just me whining.

Third question is what are monoblocks, how are they used, and what are their advantages to a system? They were used at one of my speaker auditions.

I figured out the answer to what amplifier damping was myself, so I’m sparing you that one, but what does the term impedance mean? I keep coming across that.

Thank goodness I don’t have to figure out the cabling nightmare yet. Thanks for any help.

Mike
skyscraper
New or used, my only point is that the Class A Luxman amps aren't nearly the low-powered pieces that the official specs indicate. I can't compare them to other brands, I don't have the broad experience with lots of other gear that so many others have, but the L-590AX isn't a 30w amp, not by a long stretch.
Post removed 
Trying to explain amp classes is a little complicated, but I’ll try.

Transistors don’t just turn on as soon as you apply some sort of signal to them. It depends on the transistor, but a typical value just to turn them on is a .7V difference between the gate and source or base and collector pins. It can vary a good bit though.

That’s a problem. For the sake of discussion we’re going to talk about complimentary push-pull topology because all class AB amps are that topology. If it takes .7 volts (an arbitrary number for description sake), the trasistors aren’t going to produce any gain until that signal strength is reached. That produces what’s called crossover distortion. Crossover distortion is nonlinearity in gain as the signal swingings from positive to negative and is handed off from the transistor pushing to the transistor pulling.

The solution to crossover distortion is to bias the transistors. Biasing is putting some DC on the gate or base pins of the transistor to turn it on. This is where we get into the difference between class AB and class A. In a class AB amp the bias is just enough to turn the transistors on a little bit just to get the into their linear region and past that .7 volts where they do nothing. In a class a A amp you go much further than that. In a class A amp you bias the transistors deep into their linear region. This causes them to draw amps of current at idle instead of milliamps like in class AB. That’s why class A amps are so big and heavy. The cooling solutions need to be vastly more robust and the power supply needs to be much more muscular.

As a class AB amp amplifies a signal, one half of the amp amplifies the positive half of the signal while the other half amplifies the negative half. In a class A amp both halves of the amp are biased so high that (ideally) neither side of the push-pull ever shuts off and both sides carry the signal completely. The benefit of this is that the nonlinearity of the individual gain devices are minimized. The strengths of one transistor minimize the weaknesses of the other transistor. That’s the idea at least.

A good class AB amp with well matched parts can hold it’s own against a class A amp, but many, myself included, feel class A has superior sound.

Additionally, a push-pull class A amp can easily transition to class AB and belt out 2 or 3 times it’s rated power for headroom vastly higher than it’s nominal power rating suggests. It does so with a small distortion penalty. However, class AB has a similar distortion penalty as the signal surpasses the low bias. Typically that shows up as higher distortion at low power levels and in micro-details.

Class D is a radically different animal. In class D the devices are only turned on at super high frequencies related to the instantaneous demands of the signal. The output signal is nothing more than very high frequency pulses in proportion to the input signal. The output then needs to be extensively filtered to turn it back into a linear waveform without the high frequency noise produced by the constant switching of the gain devices. Opinions on class D are world’s apart. Some hate it. Some love it. Ultimately, the gold standard class D is being judged by is class A, and I don’t think anybody disagrees with class A being the ideal class of amplification.

If you have any other questions, feel free. To get better clarity on the subject of classes I suggest Nelson Pass’s article "leaving class A" and his Burning Amp lecture "selected topics on push-pull topologies"
Just read the "Is Hegel made in China? thread". Apparently they are, so that eliminates that integrated amp choice no matter what Alon Wolf recommends. I'll take a closer look at some other brands like Luxman,  Macintosh or others.

Shkong, I will definitely check into the integrated  Lyngdorf, Micromegan, and Devialet, models as you suggest. Thanks for the recommendations. I was reading about room correction too last night, and it sounded pretty interesting. 

I am not really wanting used equipment or concerned with resale value. Eventually I plan on being entombed with these same components like an Egyptian pharaoh.  

Builder, thanks for the clarification on wattage.

Kosst_amojan, Holy smokes, thank you much for your extensive in depth explanation of amp classes. You outdid yourself. I'll have to re-read your explanation a few times to understand amp classes more fully. Thank goodness there's no class C. I'll find that Nelson Pass article too. Thanks again for the education. It's very much appreciated.

Mike. 


Post removed