I'm more concerned with the quality of the reviews and how closely the writer's perceptions tend to match mine as a body of work. If the guy is banging on about how great something is and his opinions are real hit and miss next to mine, I'll be pretty skeptical.
Overall, audio journalism is an exceptionally low standard, allowing practically anybody who can use adjectives into the stable. Actual honest, critical evaluations are rare, and any legit review should speak some ill since nothing is perfect. A plethora of gloating opinions aren't as valuable as one carefully crafted, truly critical review citing the good and bad.
Overall, audio journalism is an exceptionally low standard, allowing practically anybody who can use adjectives into the stable. Actual honest, critical evaluations are rare, and any legit review should speak some ill since nothing is perfect. A plethora of gloating opinions aren't as valuable as one carefully crafted, truly critical review citing the good and bad.

