Magnepan 3.7 - 3.7i owners need help please


Hello, I have owned a pair of Magnepan 3.6r's for quite some time. I was assured that the 3.7i's were a big step in sonic improvement over the 3.6r's. So, I went and bought a brand new pair of 3.7i's. Got them home, set them up, and have approximately 20 hours of play on them.

I am using the exact same equipment as I had with the 3.6r's which is a Sanders Magtech amp, a Benchmark 3 hgc dac, and the exact same decent quality cabling. The 3.6r's had a partial external crossover and I was bi-wiring. The 3.7i's do not have anything but a single pair of binding posts, so I am using the exact same speaker cable but not a bi-wire version.

What I have noticed it that they definitely do not have the depth, spatial characteristics, or openess of the 3.6r's. They do however have maybe a more predominant midrange but, at the sacrifice of the midrange being bloated or muddled at moderate volume levels. I have noticed that the 3.7i's have sort of a filter membrane behind the midrange section which my 3.6r's did not. Maybe a smaller rear dipole radiation pattern? The bass is also lacking compared to the bass response of the 3.6r's

The Dealer said they may need more break in to loosen the mylar. However if that were the case, the midrange would get worse, but thembass may get better. The passive crossovers may need some more break in time, but to be honest, i'm skeptical about all of it!

So, anyone out there that can offer some insight would be greatly appreciated. I am just a working class hero with limited financial resources. I cant afford to spend a large sum of money for something no returnable, and go backwards with disappointment. Needless to say I did not get much sleep last night. Might need a prescription for xanax at this point!
 Thanks, Steve.. 
sfrounds
@stewart0722 

Your system looks great and I can sense from the video it sounds spectacular!
sfrounds - so I've had the 3.7 for 11 years and they still sound terrible. I had the IIIAs forever and they sounded much better than these. I read your post and now I'm wondering if these are defective.

How did you figure out they were constructed wrong?
@tomhowe---You've kept a terrible sounding pair of speakers for 11 years?! What are ya, a masochist? ;-)
Hah I know - actually I'm bad at math - it's been 7 - but with the Maggies you keep saying "oh it's the break-in period they'll be great soon" and then one day I realized that they just weren't right...
2 posts .. just to mention.                            
I had owned 3.6 for eight years, bought them only months before the 3.7 came out... 2018 early Spring I thought about going to the 3.7i And then realized it was only a lateral move. So I splurged and bought the 20.7s                                                   
The 20.7s took a couple of months to break in playing for more than 8 hours a day...                   
I have them in almost the exact same location as the 3.6 were.Personally going to a 3.7i from a 3.6 is not much of a change. And for the money, might be disappointing. The 20.7 have a way better midrange clarity ove the 3 models. And better bass. Sine the 20.7 tweeter is identical to the 3.7/3.7i, and interchangeable.. not much difference there.