"Imo, it's not a good idea, you don't want to use a active crossover in the receiver and the passive crossover in the speakers at the same time. "
I am curious why you think this. You are simply sending a signal that has passed a low-pass filter to another filter that should pass that signal (if set low enough).
I can see a situation where the signal sent from the receiver is too 'low' for the difference between the frequency ranges of the low to mid speakers, which is why I advised to dial it up till it sounds full. seems like this method would allow you to better control the low end.
On the other hand I see no issue with doing it like you suggested (as I have done both) except it is harder to control the 'amount' of low end.
I am curious why you think this. You are simply sending a signal that has passed a low-pass filter to another filter that should pass that signal (if set low enough).
I can see a situation where the signal sent from the receiver is too 'low' for the difference between the frequency ranges of the low to mid speakers, which is why I advised to dial it up till it sounds full. seems like this method would allow you to better control the low end.
On the other hand I see no issue with doing it like you suggested (as I have done both) except it is harder to control the 'amount' of low end.

