Hi Fi Tuning Supreme fuse-Burn In?


Hello,
I've gone through the Hi Fi Tuning line of fuses starting with their Silver and then on to the Classic Gold.
I recently purchased the the Supreme.
The Supreme does everything I hoped it would but as with anything in this crazy hobby, there's seems to be a trade-off.
I'm getting more clarity and air but the presentation seems to have an edge or sharpness to it.
If everything was just slightly more-should I say organic?-I'd be one happy man.
I have about 60 hours on them.
Will more time smooth things out?
The Gold's are definitely smoother but they lack the air and clarity the Supreme's provide.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

greh
@kosst_amojan.

I believe my ear/brain interface!  I also believe gear designers who specify specific brands of fuses for specific circuit applications and mark the fuses for directionality so if the listener ever needs to replace one of those fuses they know how they should be oriented.

You seem well informed on audio issues so I am perplexed that such nuances of circuit execution have escaped you. I truly don't get it.  OR are you simply so skeptical, in general, that you have never even tried to hear such differences?  

No offense intended.  If you haven't tried these more nuanced tweaks, then why condemn those who have and appreciate the differences they bring to their systems?
@kosst_amojan. 

I would like to challenge you to order one E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies, put it inside the door of your electric service and after a few weeks pass, claim you do not hear a new-found naturalness to your system, and see an improved clarity and smoothness of texture on your video picture.

Nothing whatsoever nuanced about what those Mats do!!
@hifiman5 

It's real simple why I don't buy into this jazz. It doesn't work. It seems to me that if this stuff did work, and it's so simple to use even an audiophile can install it, then there'd be some actual legitimate proof of what it does. Show me the measurements of an amp on an AP before and after. Modern AP's measure stuff out way beyond human range and resolution. 

There's so much that on it's face doesn't make sense. A body of nothing but anecdotal evidence. That evidence overwhelmingly doting on improvement. No actual scientific or quantitative evidence at all. It's all the hallmarks one would find in the marketing of radium suppositories. Is an actual measurement of a claimed result really unreasonable to ask? And if one could actually be obtained, wouldn't that be some very impressive advertising since most people think this stuff is snake oil?
Clausius would be SO PROUD of that last post. What a swirling blast of hot air and cerebral entropy!
Post removed