A very good ENGINEERING explanation of why analog can not be as good as digital..


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzRvSWPZQYk

There will still be some flat earthers who refuse to believe it....
Those should watch the video a second or third time :-)
cakyol
No matter what the resolution and data rate a digital representation of a sound, it will always be an approximation of the original event.
+1,  Tom1000
I have some vinyl albums that sound much better than the redbook cd. I also have many (not all) hires/dsd that sound much better than vinyl. When I hear a great sounding MQA mix, this is much better than vinyl.
my analog setup costs over 3x more than my digital setup
If you oriced they video did go in to issues with digital.  Mostly compression and the overly mastered music to ale up for the compression.  Without getting in toy which is better, I wonder if someone who has spent 30 ears doing digital can master an analog recording properly ithout bringing gains way up in fat sections.
Science to the rescue.  Forget your ears, listen to the CODEC, which, by definition, SUBTRACTS bits and then "tries" to put them back in.

Better yet, listen to a "digital" B-3 and/or "electronic" drums and then the originals.  Different, but which one is the B-3?  If you can't tell, then anything you listen to is fine with you and me.  Doesn't make you "wrong" and me "right" any more than liking a food or car that I don't care for does. 

I suggest that you listen to the MUSIC and not worry so much about all this silliness.

Enjoy.