fleschler: I might have stated it wrong. What I meant is that most classical and jazz recordings are not highly compressed. I did not mean that highly compressed jazz and classical recordings are in any way preferable when listening through a resolving system.
Compression is always used in any kind of close miking situation (there are some very rare exceptions using discreet two-mic recording techniques, but that doesn't necessarily make the recordings better, just that the emphasis is on different sounds such as ambience, natural room reflections etc.). Without judicial compression mixing close-miked signals, mastering would be practically impossible and the result would be a sonic mess.
Compression is also a good thing when listening to music casually. If you are not sitting in your listening chair and concentrating on the music, compression can help even out the sound dynamics and create a less tedious listening experience. Fortunately for those of us who sit glued into listening positions, the compression is usually light when applied to classical, jazz and "less mass-consumer oriented" music. Pop music is usually heavily compressed, but the consumer is generally listening while moving around the room or as background music, through a low resolution system or cheap earbuds or headphones, or in their car.
It is delightful, sometimes, to hear the old classic rock albums that have been re-mastered with less compression. I've already pointed out the example of recently released Grateful Dead recordings (some of those older CDs sound muffled in comparison). It is worth looking into some of these newer releases, but be aware they may not sound just like you remembered. The Jimmy Page authorized (he was involved in the re-mastering) Led Zeppelin releases almost sound like new music!
A lot of recordings from the '50s and '60s have very little compression. They were designed for the new high-end stereos that were coming out. We consumed music differently back then; the fidelity of most radios and cheap record players was so low that compression levels didn't matter.
Compression is always used in any kind of close miking situation (there are some very rare exceptions using discreet two-mic recording techniques, but that doesn't necessarily make the recordings better, just that the emphasis is on different sounds such as ambience, natural room reflections etc.). Without judicial compression mixing close-miked signals, mastering would be practically impossible and the result would be a sonic mess.
Compression is also a good thing when listening to music casually. If you are not sitting in your listening chair and concentrating on the music, compression can help even out the sound dynamics and create a less tedious listening experience. Fortunately for those of us who sit glued into listening positions, the compression is usually light when applied to classical, jazz and "less mass-consumer oriented" music. Pop music is usually heavily compressed, but the consumer is generally listening while moving around the room or as background music, through a low resolution system or cheap earbuds or headphones, or in their car.
It is delightful, sometimes, to hear the old classic rock albums that have been re-mastered with less compression. I've already pointed out the example of recently released Grateful Dead recordings (some of those older CDs sound muffled in comparison). It is worth looking into some of these newer releases, but be aware they may not sound just like you remembered. The Jimmy Page authorized (he was involved in the re-mastering) Led Zeppelin releases almost sound like new music!
A lot of recordings from the '50s and '60s have very little compression. They were designed for the new high-end stereos that were coming out. We consumed music differently back then; the fidelity of most radios and cheap record players was so low that compression levels didn't matter.