I remember reading an article where John Curl said he would spec a
certain grade of components, for a piece of Parasound audio equipment he
designed, only to be overruled the owners of the company saying it
would make the price of the piece of equipment to high and price it out
of the market competition.
I have read this before, and I feel it is unnecessary sour grapes.
I mean, sure, we all dream of cost is no object for all the gear we buy, or might envision, but the reality is that all engineers face cost / performance challenges. How they solve them is the mark of the very best engineers.
I like Paraound, I think the Halo line provides excellent value for money. Would I buy an A21 or A23 if it was 2x the cost? Probably not.
What would be interesting to me is to hear the difference. That is, what would a JC spec A21 sound like vs. what was produced. Would we hear it? Would we be willing to pay the price for the differences? That would absolutely be interesting.
Best,
E