Of all the things mentioned I would say the DAC is the main piece I would upgrade and the CD player last. That or a an updated mid to high end CD player with a better built in DAC than something from 1990.
Some components too old now?
I have a traditional HiFi. Some bits are really old, but still working fine and I wouldn’t have a clue about updating even if I wanted to. Just wondering how long I can expect them to last, and whether I should pro-actively seek to update before there’s a catastrophic failure.
In particular, my CD player, pre-amp and DAC date back to around 1990, so these are about 30 years old now:
Marantz CD80 / Aragon 24k (with phono stage that I use) / Aragon D2A
Thoughts?
In particular, my CD player, pre-amp and DAC date back to around 1990, so these are about 30 years old now:
Marantz CD80 / Aragon 24k (with phono stage that I use) / Aragon D2A
Thoughts?
- ...
- 33 posts total
Like you said, it was one of the best in its' day, but that was more than 20 years ago. I think you'll find just about any DAC built recently will be a significant improvement. I found a link to another forum (hopefully allowed) asking the same question: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/dacs-old-vs-new.3229/ B |
The newer connections USB and HDMI n particular may or may not be needed. I was using a DAC from the mid 90's myself until just this past Summer. I paid $250 for it. ($1000 list). To find something really better cost me $7000. So sure there are better DACs... They also cost a lot more. Spending $500, $800 for a new DAC today probably is not going to do a lot for you... Except add a USB port. Lateral move... On the other hand, I am certain the Yggdrasil ($2300) is pretty good too. And if I had not wanted to splurge on the Marantz SA-10, I would have bought a Yeggy. And I should have considered the PS Audio.. but my dealer carried the Marantz.. |
- 33 posts total

