No one actually knows how to lculate what speaker cable they need

b4icu, 
Maybe some people don't care for some guy showing up on the scene and making ridiculous claims to some esoteric knowledge they clearly don't have. Guys like you, and the people you impress, out there using jumper cables for their speakers, look pretty silly to those of us who have a clue. You're ideas are silly in their own right, but you yourself are silly for claiming you've discovered the knowledge nobody else has in over 100 years of electrical engineering. I don't know why, but every few months one of your type comes out of the woodwork with some gimmick. Yours is jumper cables. There was a guy here banging on about "infra-bass", or something like that, whatever that is. Another guy went nuts about his "holographic amplifier" that "cloned" the recording venue. I think he was the same guy who claimed to have invented a 4th mode to operate transistors in. I'm sure there will be another fuse thread before too long. 

Mr. kosst_amojan

In science, there are ways to deal with claims. Some are proven right others to be wrong. History will tell if any other came earlier to claim the same. On both, I never had a guy on this thread to prove me wrong. All claims were of "different" nature. The so called jumper cables is not exactly what I claim, as some need less thick and other more thick cables, as per their equipment.

My say doesn’t claim anything new or unknown so far to the electronics or electricity science. I just say that there is a relation between amp’s property’s (DF) and the speaker cable required resistance. On the fly, many tried to get me down from this idea, with variety of says, most common urban myths of the cables industry, till we got to Quantum mechanics. I’ll give that the benefit of the doubt, it was funny. For those who gave it a try, with a moderate budget of under US $100.- ended up embracing this idea and very happy with the results.

The audio industry had many claims since it was introduced. Some were well done and stayed. Others came and gone. At the time they were in fashion, some made a lot of money. Money we paid for listening and purchasing that idea. The same was with media and standards. Like the Mini Disc and the ATRAC coding method (SONY). Some made an impressing comeback: LP and tube amplification.

“In science, there are ways to deal with claims. Some are proven right others to be wrong. History will tell if any other came earlier to claim the same. On both, I never had a guy on this thread to prove me wrong. All claims were of "different" nature. The so called jumper cables is not exactly what I claim, as some need less thick and other more thick cables, as per their equipment.”

@b4icu That’s true, nobody here proved you wrong. But, and here’s the kicker, you didn’t prove anybody wrong here, either. You know, like wire directionality and conductor purity, for example. And there’s a reason for that. In science, you cannot prove a negative. Hel-loo! Be that as it may, you haven’t even proved yourself right. How about them apples? 🍎 

B4icu,

Why do you keep clinging to science? There is no science to your claims. You’ve presented no scientific proof. Where’s your formal theory or formula? You can’t cling to science while exempting yourself from it’s rigors.

A 10KHz signal is only using about 1/16th of an inch of a wire’s cross section. Anything thicker than that just produces more and more inductive impedance as the wire gets thicker and as the frequency increases. A 15KHz signal through a 6 foot 0g cable is seeing a massive amount of impedance. That’s stuff you can look up the numbers and actually model. That’s science. That’s not good for speaker cables. This is very elementary stuff.