GaN-based Class D power amps


The use of GaN-based power transistor tech is now emerging for Class D audio power amplifiers. Seems appropriate to devote a forum thread to this topic. At least 3 companies have commercial class D amps in their books:

Merrill Audio, with their model Element 118 ($36k per monoblock, 400 W into 8 ohms, 800W into 4 ohms), Element 116 ($22k per monoblock, 300 W into 8 ohms, 600W into 4 ohms) and Element 114 (coming soon). 
https://merrillaudio.net

Review of Element 118 at this link:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/superioraudio/equipment/1018/Merrill_Audio_Element_118_Monoblock_Amplif...

ADG Productions, with their Vivace Class D amp ($15k per monoblock pair, 100W into 4 ohms). (The designer emailed me indicating he has another product in the pipeline.)
http://agdproduction.com
Review of the Vivace Class D moniblocks at this link (warning: link might not work (1/11/2019)):
https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/agd-production-vivace-gantube-monoblock-ampli...

Technics SE-R1 Class D stereo amp ($17k per stereo amp, 150WPC into 8 ohms, 300WPC into 4 ohms) 
https://www.technics.com/us/products/r1/se-r1.html
Preliminary review of the Technics SE-R1 at this link:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/technics-se-r1-digital-amplifier
Technics also has a lower priced GaN-based class D integrated amp in their catalog:
https://www.technics.com/us/products/grand-class/stereo-integrated-amplifier-su-g700.html

Anyone listened to or own any of these amps?


celander
:((((

I should never have checked out this thread.

Reading Merrills' amp reviews/comments I am so disheartened that the commenters own amps (including Merrill's pre Element series) significantly more expensive than anything I can dream about being so much better. Even the AGD Vivacies (which also have outstanding reviews) are way out of reach 
I’d like to see the raw output of a GaN switch in a class d amp configuration, and find out exactly how much of that hard slewing --consists of odd ordered harmonics.

As, if the device is incapable of being linear, then ..it it very likely going to produce large amounts of odd ordered harmonics.. theory seems to say that but the design of GaN may make this problem go away. This problem that exists in all transistors up to this time.

the more non linear the gain curve of a transistor, the more odd ordered harmonics it generates. The more linear the gain curve of the transistor, the more even ordered the harmonics in it’s distortions.

This is why Nelson Pass went out of his way to have set of SIT (V-Fet) transistors made by semi-south (a manufacturer since gobbled up by someone else).

V-Fets have linear gain curves, very much so, similar to a triode tube. This is a big deal, a very big deal and it becomes that, when a person hears it..for a long enough time to understand what is going on. like intelligence, it takes different amounts of time for a person to work through--to the hearing of it. Some might never get there (cable haters, etc).

This not speculative, it’s part of the human spectrum. Until one hears a v-fet signal reproduction system, they have literally..no idea. It’s all gobbledygook and a bunch of words, until then.(of course, they need to possess the wherewithal in their personal and unique hearing and brain... and the time spent listening--- to ’get it’)


The harder (or faster) a transistor turns on or off, in time, ie, hard slewing, the greater the set of distortions produced in level as compared to the pure on/off aspect.

Using that signal (from the GaN transistor) as the basis of the sine reproduction, means that the sine, or audio waveform recovered is going to consist of a notable amount of odd ordered harmonics, which is very unfavorable to human hearing.

The fact that the GaN transistor turns off and on.. fast... and does not generate heat ’so much’ ( in comparison to fets), means it generates lower harmonics, and that may be key here. This is the whole enchilada of my question set and points/data mentioned. Are those distortions odd ordered or even, what is the mix if any... and what are their levels compared to the main switch period itself?

We do indeed hear odd ordered harmonics better, but that would be the wrong direction. We hear them and we don't like them. They are uncomfortable and don't represent or mix with our reality. They stick out. Thus, false obscuring detail. The early transistor sound.

This is an important question, it is deeply connected to the class d amplifier issue, as the prior incarnations of class d all suffer from this problem. It is why some of us are not so fond of class d amplifiers. The signal is too close to being based on large amounts of odd ordered harmonic switching reflections. We hear it and it sounds like..well.. uncomfortable, dirty, screeching, obscuring, false details and generally..... unwanted.

If a GaN transistor will not trace a linear gain curve and will not do ’gain’ and only do switching, then it may be entirely odd ordered harmonics that are generated in this fast switching time?

Which is entirely wrong for audio.

This is a very important question set about the fundamentals of the move into GaN for audio.

Lets try not to do the wrong thing again as it is economically cool (new toy, wonderment, etc) to do so.

This is the sort of stuff we missed with digital that took us +20 years to get a grip on after the fact ...and really begin to fix the the damned mess. Twenty years of crap had to come first. Let’s not do this again. We’ve already started down that road with class D as it stands....
I contacted Paul McGowan (PS Audio) about his Sellar dac/pre, and also asked whether they are playing with GaN. He said they haven't looked into it, yet. Hmmmm?  They would be the likely lowest price option
Let me just say, that if the problem of non linear distortion generated has been fixed from the fet based class-D of the now..then I’m all for it.

I’ll jump of the dang cliff and dive so deep I hit the bottom and nearly die.

I wanted class D to do a new thing, to be the new better kid, but it was not. Not even close. Efficiency was there but the audio essentials, the reason for it to exist -- all of that went into a meat grinder.

The world of audio needs/desires -outside of perfectionist audio- made it so that the music was sacrificed for financial/business/sales efficiency.

It’s the same reason we ended up with digital and it took over 20 years to try and find out how to fix it after the fact. And we’re still not there.

I spent two years working on extant class D designs and correcting their flaws, inch by inch.

It all got tossed, as no matter what I did, they could not equal the amplifiers of old and current linear design. The flaws were and are fatal and endemic to the device design criteria/operation itself.

If GaN can cut the core of that flaw out, then I’m probably in with all limbs, again.