tweak1
George, wasn’t it you who told me when I had the Hattor XLR passive pre George, wasn’t it you who told me when I had the Hattor XLR passive pre that it was a impedance mismatch with both my Emerald Physics, then later with my Audio Alchemy DPA-1?
With one there was a mismatch and you weren’t getting the best from it, with the other it was fine. And I suggested a buffer stage with the Hattor for the Emerald Phyics
Yes and here is what’s said
georgehifi4,817 posts06-27-2018 9:26amtweak1 OP
My EP KC IIs sound fantastic
Actually hate to say, your Emerald Phyics EP-100.2SE Class-D amps are not a great match for a passive pre, as their input impedance is "not typical" as they are very low at 19kohm, your passive preamp while working fine would sound even better if it had a unity gain buffer on it’s output.
For a 10kohm passive to work it’s magic the input impedance of an amp/s should be 33kohm or higher.
And this to the other amp.
georgehifi4,817 posts06-28-2018 7:40amtweak1 OP
I have been keen on getting a Nord Two Stereo amp, but need to sell at least one SE first
This will be great with your Hattor Passive Pre and much better.
As the Nord is double the input impedance of the Emerald Phyics no need for a buffer then. I always say the best buffer is no buffer if possible.
Enough on this impedance subject or celander will get his nickers in a knot, especially Michael Powell for bringing it up..
Cheers George

