The Science of Cables


It seems to me that there is too little scientific, objective evidence for why cables sound the way they do. When I see discussions on cables, physical attributes are discussed; things like shielding, gauge, material, geometry, etc. and rarely are things like resistance, impedance, inductance, capacitance, etc. Why is this? Why aren’t cables discussed in terms of physical measurements very often?

Seems to me like that would increase the customer base. I know several “objectivist” that won’t accept any of your claims unless you have measurements and blind tests. If there were measurements that correlated to what you hear, I think more people would be interested in cables. 

I know cables are often system dependent but there are still many generalizations that can be made.
128x128mkgus
jhills
coated with Graphene; or filled with incredible, semi-conductor liquid; or made in USA ultra high grade, specially treated, conductors - with multi layers of high-tech shielding (actually come from China bulk conductor wire - the equivalent of 24AWG at about $.25 pr. ft ...
Will you please tell us exactly which $1,000-per-foot audio cable you are referring to here? Will you please tells us which specific claims are troubling you?
... the wild claims of some of these high priced cable guys - some of which already facing, or have faced, suits and fines for false claims and improper business practices.
Will you please be specific about these "suits and fines for false claims?" Can you cite more than one instance?
jhulls, nice try, partner, but those aren’t wild claims. In fact, they’re not claims of any kind. They’re called, descriptions. Pretty harmless. Better luck next rodeo, cowboy 🤠
Post removed 
"Will you please tells us which specific claims are troubling you?"

I cannot speak for jhills, but maybe he had something like this on his mind. Just one of many and not specific to a particular manufacturer.

"...we acted on the new information and built cable assemblies that incorporated this idea and the results produced spectacular results."

Would it qualify as

"Such a penchant for hyperbole"
?