Ripping SACD vs regular CD


I have been ripping my CD's using DB Poweramp and have gotten to my SACD's. Some are duplicate titles that I have already ripped a CD for. Is there any advantage to utilizing the SACD cd layer rip? I dont want to overwrite the MOFI DSOTM with the SACD cd layer if its not superior. I could put them in a seperate folder if there is an advantage.
stl114_nj
If you don't have a computer drive that reads the SACD layer then the only thing you can rip is the cd layer of hybrid SACD disks. Doubt there is any improvement there. To my knowledge there aren't SACD drives for computers.

Please someone chime in and tell me I'm wrong because I'd love to be able to rip my SACDs.

Regards,
Charlie
i have two versions of a cd. the first is the original. then it was remastered as a hybrid sacd. i compared the hybrid layer with the redbook layer of the original cd and preferred the hybrid layer.

so, it would seem intuitive that copying the hybrid layer may give an aadvantage over copying the first version.
My strong supposition is that ripping the SACD layer will be of no use unless you have a DSD capable DAC, of which there are very few, IIRC.
There's nothing that can rip the sacd layer. There's not even any non-proprietary sacd digital out. It's to stop people ripping it.
Depending on your drive you can rip the cd layer of a hybrid sacd. I have ripped that exact disc. I have one drive that works and one that doesn't.

In a case where your cd is old and the sacd is remastered it would be better to rip the remastered version.