Zaikesman,
I agree, as long as everything is done properly in the testing, that a good turntable speed consistency is a good thing. Of course, also in keeping with all the other necessary attributes.
I only bring up the caution to not get into a "tunnel vision" approach to things.
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but I have been around audiophiles long enough to know that they tend to get "extremist" about certain things. I think it is important to emphasize good overall performance of the system as a whole. Because a very good overall implementation may very well outperform an implementation that excels only in one area.
Not trying to put a damper on things, but just trying to bring a note of caution into the discussion.
I agree, as long as everything is done properly in the testing, that a good turntable speed consistency is a good thing. Of course, also in keeping with all the other necessary attributes.
I only bring up the caution to not get into a "tunnel vision" approach to things.
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but I have been around audiophiles long enough to know that they tend to get "extremist" about certain things. I think it is important to emphasize good overall performance of the system as a whole. Because a very good overall implementation may very well outperform an implementation that excels only in one area.
Not trying to put a damper on things, but just trying to bring a note of caution into the discussion.

