1. Home
  2. analog
  3. 1198677127

How many LPs is enough?

Right-- the answer is "Just a few more..." However, here is where I am and what I'm thinking: The last three times I was in my local used/thrift shops, I came across a few that I was not quite sure if I already had, or whether I had that pressing. I wondered if I need to carry a Blackberry (anathema to my analog way of life) with my collection downloaded so that I could avoid this kind of dilemma.
I only own about 700 or so titles, spanning classical box sets to recent limited-release albums. I realize that this is nothing compared to most of you, but I donate what I upgrade and I sell what I do not enjoy listening to. I maintain an Excel database of what I have, and enter each upon cleaning and test-listening; I don't just buy 'em and throw 'em in a bin. While it is rather engaging to compare, say, six versions of Bolero or Beethoven's symphonies 1-9 to determine which sounds best, am I really going to listen to the other five once this is determined? Likewise, while I own a stereo and mono version, and often an audiophile reissue, of most of my favorite late '50's through '60's jazz, surf, folk, and psych, it usually turns out that one or the other sounds significantly better. My overriding rationale is that I don't really need more than a one-year supply of one title per day. While building my collection, I have enjoyed making the comparisons or searching out the missing performance when it comes to classical, but nobody who I expose to this stuff is interested in making these comparisons-- they want to hear the vinyl magic, so I always pull the superior recording.
Maybe I only need about 300-400 titles of what I consider best of the best. Even when and if I retire and have more free time, I'm not sure that I would listen to more than one LP per day, and this gives me a year of no-repeats. Of course, my husk can still haunt the local thrifts and resale shops for that fifty-cent, mint six-eye Kind of Blue, so long as I immediately sell my two-eye... Has anyone else come to this conclusion? Am I to be immediately and henceforth banished from the Brotherhood of Crusty Vinyl Seekers after having my stylus bent?
morgenholz
elizabeth
6,726 posts
 
I bought 14,000 in about 2 years...
Mostly at $0.10 or so.
Then I sorted them out and tossed about 4,000.
Then I had to move and discarded another 4,000 LPs.
So now I have a nice collection of 6,000 or so.
david12
1,398 posts
 
The answer is, when my current rack is full. I have had clear guidance from my wife, that the system has encroached enough. It makes it simple really, no more aquisitive pressure.
There was a recent link on Pink Fish to a report from Robert Harley on the king of audiophiles, a Chines gent with a 5 story warehouse full of kit, new and old. It included top of the range amps speakers, turntables. What the point is, escapes me. A last remark was that he had just bought a collection of 200,000 LPs, yes thats not a typo. Someone worked out, it would take 28years to listen to them once.
shiprepair
16 posts
 
I'm a classical buff and when CDs were fist introduced I decided that I did not like the sound. My friends were switching to CDs and discarding their Lps, stores were selling LPs at give away prices so I just sucked them up and added to my collection. What I had saved in paying for CDs I upgraded my hard ware. One of the best decisions I ever made.

It got to the point where I was picking up stuff and couldn't remember which Haydn string quartet I had or if I had a particular Corelli concerto grosso so I did what Rushton did. I set up a database file in Microsoft works 3.0 DOS. It was a labour of love at the beginning and I still do it now up to 5,600 entries. Whenever I go "shopping" I print out the works of the composers I am interested in purchasing recordings of and consult it when I see something I am interested in.

The data base is also useful in being able to manipulate the data and I can arrange my collection by when the music was written and then listen to a development of the composers work.

Given that I(we) live in a technology time capsule I have had to purchase a back up hard drive to protect my DOS data base. But I have to say that we have to thank the hard ware technology of today as perhaps 25 years after the cessation of whole scale production of vinyl, it has never sounded better.

But to the answer to how many is enough? I think every body is right. As you pick up esoteric or rare recordings you go chasing down another composer, style,era and it all begins again. I tell my wife that this collection thing is a male passion not totally removed from the hunt. I'm lucky enough to work out of my home so I will probably listen to about 3 to 4 records a day.

I hope I made acontribution, thanks for reading.

Martyn
thomasedison
34 posts
 
I'm also lucky enough to work at home. My work desk is at the back of my listening room, so I get great sound all day long. I used to listen all day to my digital music collection from my computer hooked up to my stereo, so I would'nt have to get up so often. But then I developed a bad back from sitting too long in one place.

My doctor just told me I need to get up every 20-30 minutes to stretch in order to prevent future back issues. So I've switched back to vinyl while I work, which forces me to take those stretch breaks. Now I listen to around 10 LPs per day...Doctor's Orders!!!
jyprez's avatar
jyprez
229 posts
 
I am more for quality than quantity myself. I started collecting jazz about 5 years ago and have about 1500 now (about 1/2 original issies, 1/4 early reissues and 1/4 newer (post danalog age)"audiophile" reissues). Average cost about $50/record but many are in the $75 to $300 range for a very nice early Blue note for example. I find that you very rarely find anything of quality in jazz at most used record stores, let alone the thrift shops so I dont bother with these. I have a few key sources (which I will not disclose), that have "the really good stuff" but at a price that is commensurate with the quality. You just cant expect to get a record from the early 50's in near mint condition for a cheap price I have found,(not very often anyhow. To avoid buying duplicates, I carefully catalog each record in Excel making special note of things like address on label, issue info, marks in the deadwax etc. All of this is critical to properly identifying the issue of jazz records which, unlike rock, were issued and reissued many times with varying quality in the heydays of vinyl.
More to discover