Raven One

that would of curse lead me to ask,...how good is the arm compared to say a Rega RB300? is it a good enough table to get a high end arm, like a phantom for example?

is it a good enough table to get a high end arm, like a phantom for example?

I think, no one can say it, because it is too new on market and such combination will be rare.
But I think, it is worth a try.

Thomas, how does the Raven compare to your Basis?

Andrew:

How does the Raven 1 compare with the Mambo? These seem to be similar in theory both plinthless suspensionless belt drives. More mass loading on the Raven with what I would suspect to be a higher torque motor.

Just out of curiosity, which bearing has a longer bearing sleeve? I know it's not really an indication of anything but general construction.

Thanks.

Ducatirider,

I don't know how the Raven 1 compares to the Mambo. But theoretically, I think the motor of the Raven One is much better than Mambo and this could likely make it sound better. People in the know beleive the direct drive TT's (Garrard, EMT, etc) are the cream of the crop. The Raven motor behaves close to a direct drive in torque and speed control.

My points about the AC vs the One where more relaible since they were in the same system, aside from different cartridges and arms. However, the AC had a better arm and cartrdge on it. I think they are close enough given the 5K price difference. If funds are an issue then go with the Raven One. The AC is better but as you know, the law of diminishing returns applies like it does to most gear.

I'm not sure about sleave lengths.