"Original Jazz Classics"


I picked up a handful of "OJC" 33 RPM pressings from a major online retailer last week. The short version is three are very good recordings and the other two just stink - tinny and compressed. I'm sure it's the recording/mastering and not the particular pressing. The two I'm not happy with are Getz's "The Brothers" and "In the Bag" by Adderly. Labels are Prestige and Jazzland, respectively.

What is the best way to learn to avoid "bad" recordings? I don't think either of these cases are exactly indicative of the labels themselves - I don't think avoiding the labels is the answer.

I suppose I just really need to research the specific recording I'm interested in before buying if I want to avoid this in the future? Or are there some guidelines I might be aware of?
paulfolbrecht
Milestone re-released Waltz For Debby and Sunday At The Village Vangard, which is from the same sessions, as a two LP set, with a couple of added tracks in the twofer series called The Village Vangard Sessions, and the sonics are quite good, as well. I think that a lot of bird gets whipped abour Scott LaFaro as the bassist that had the psychic connection with Evans. All this heightened by his untimely death, in a car accident, right after the two records were recorded. But, for my money, Eddie Gomez blows my mind. Try Bill Evans At The Montreux Jazz Festival, on Verve!
To witness Evans & LaFaro 'dancing', as they did, seemingly reading each others' minds, mesmerizes me every time.

But I have not heard the latter recording you mention and will make it a note to check that out - thanks for the tip!
Without a doubt the OJC catalog was the bargain of the century. Hundreds of great performances and a great price to boot. Ah the good old days (2 years ago) when they could be purchased for less than ten bucks. Then along comes Concorde Music Group who buys the total catalog. Now we have no more cheap OJC's as the powers that be don't want to dabble with the lunatic fringe and waste money on what must have been a break even endeavor for Fantasy. More money to be made by reissuing "remastered" compilation CD's. Ah but wait. Why not address the needs of the lunatic fringe by having an audiophile label pay big $$ to manufacture heavyweight remastered virgin vinyl blessed by angels? Make it a limited numbered production run with certificates and make it expensive (if you don't they will think its CRAP!!).

Then have a shrill at one of the magazines ramble on about sound stage depth and height and before you can say audiophile--- another remaster of a 40 year old album enters the sales charts at you know where.... as number 1.

Consider yourself lucky to have found some OJC's. Some dealers still have a few but the really good ones are long gone.
the 'performances' are the reward, not the sonics, when it comes to collecting old or reissued recordings. even audiophile pressings(which the ojc's are not), are all over the place in terms on sound. many of the analogue releases use the most updated digital masters....the ones from the late 80's and early 90's aren't the greatest.....referencing the last or latest cd release sometimes offers clues to the quality of the most recent lp. not always...but often.
Yep Vinylrowe hit it right on the head. Pick up as many of those OJC pressings as you can. They are a steal for both the performances offered and in many cases the sound quality. The originals are not as quiet and would cost much much more than the OJCs.