How is it ? that a tuner smokes the table ???


"(cats out of the bag)"

my friends dynalab 109 tube tuner blows away his turntable front end that costs 4X as much!!!

Can any one explain how a cd or analog turntable at a radio station gets played and sent thru the air and gets
reconstructed at the tuner is the single highest quality
source in hiend two channel reproduction !

that blows me away and I can understand it ?

IMHO tuner highest source than turntable than CD in that order.

I wish somebody told me this before I spend so much money !

what sayest thou ?
jimpcn
The most rewarding experience is listening to a direct FM transmitted from the concert hall live , even with my bottom of the line Magnum Dynalab MD 90 T it is the closest approach to beeing in first row at the concert.
Of course the reason for this is that there is no recording process degrading the signal in the transmitting chain. I listen only vinyl for the quality of recorded sound, but when there is a live FM transmitted concert it is better than any other recorded media. Even with a modest tuner.
This is an interesting thread for the most part, I certainly learned quite a bit from those who could describe the radio broadcast chain. Never knew the details but I did know there was a lot of variability based on the station and engineer.

For instance I live in the NYC and Philly metro areas. I listen to two classical stations (among others) that each broadcast the Metropolitan Opera live on Saturday afternoons:
WQXR 96.3 in NYC and WWFM 89.1 in Mercer County NJ. The differences in quality of the broadcast are very noticeable with WWFM winning hands down. Not to say QXR is wretched but WWFM betters it by a country mile.

Of course having the same broadcast material played at the same time helps a lot in the A/B comparison. And the MD-108 don't hurt either.

I listen to a LOT of FM but I am fortunate to live within these two large markets, and there are a lot of good stations.

Cheers all.
sorry gentleman I had made an error regarding my preamp, I said it was form issue, dAudio Express Oct 2005 which is incorrect, its actually from AudioXpress Febuary 2004 issue and the article title is "A Low-MU Triode Preamp"!!!

thanks and sorry for any inconviences,
Regards Jim.
In defence of my original stance that the tuner smokes anolog front ends I would like to state this fact.

Although the dynalab 108 tuner is a very good tuner, it is based on their older design, and if you could only hear/imagine the 109 is a totally new design and I would say in a completely different league from the sound of the 108!

And yes, I know nobody said that the 108 was better, but my point is, for all of you that have the 108,
congradulations because it is very good, but the 109,
I am just stating and am quite sure will destroy any anolog front end in the world regardless of cost.
IMO.

And to this day cant understand why, it makes no sence
but is just so. imo?