Which phonostage is a heavenly match for a XV-1S


A follow on from an earlier thread in which one suggestion was that my Sutherland Phd was maybe not upto the task of allowing the very best performance from the XV-1S. I would appreciate the experiences from other owners as to which Phono stage resulted in the XV-1S having a beautiful mid range and bass along with a deep soundstage.
Thanks
ecka
I have the Einstein Turntables Choice (unbalanced version) phono preamplifier and it works great with my XV-1S and my VPI HRX.
I have not, however, auditioned any others to compare.
I agree with Aquaman regarding the Einstein phono stage. The Manley Steelhead is another great choice, which would give you a bit more bloom and dimensionality than the Einstein.

The Dynavector XV-1s is a great cartridge with relatively low output (0.3mV) and internal impedance of 6 ohms. So you want a phono stage that offers at least 65dB or so of gain, and you will want the flexibility to dial in an impedance loading of about 150 to 200 ohms.
Ecka,
better watch out here :-) 'cause that Manley Steelhead will use a step-up in the MC section as well. Just in case that was not entirely clear.

The Einstein: Design discrete (24 single transistors per channel) i.e. no tubes

Two VERY different pres those aught to be hm.

Axel
Ecka, most definitely you would do well with a better phono stage, your ears will thank you continuously.

Yes the Einstein, I use a ASR phono exclusive with my Dynavector.
Keep your eye out for a used one, either one, plenty in this hobby need to sell their toy's.
Axelwahl, the Manley Steelhead has plenty of gain in its MM stage (up to 65dB) to run the XV-1s cartridge without the extra gain of the step-up autoformers. In fact, I ran the XV-1s through the MM inputs at the time I was using the Steelhead as my reference phono stage with the XV-1s.

I preferred the sound of the XV-1s run through the MM inputs as opposed to using the step-up autoformers that are in the signal path when using the Manley's MC inputs. The sound using the MM inputs was more transparent and immediate, whereas the autoformers seemed to cast a subtle veil.