Who asked for this?


I personally think the new 2-album 45 rpm craze is a PITA and that the record companies could have brought out a product that was 98% as good on one 33.3 rpm disc. Who wants to clean and store and extra disc with every record? Well, the vinyl industry must have heard my plea and is now releasing an even bigger abomination: FOUR single-sided 45 rpm discs per record. I'm sure you can't wait to get your hands on this stuff so you can spend even more time screwing around with the records and less time listening. (nothing personal - just a rant)

http://store.acousticsounds.com/d/61219/Dave_Brubeck_Quartet-Time_Out-45_RPM_Vinyl_LP
chayro
Why the neurotic audiophile community asked for this and anything else that ramps up the cost of software while being as ergonomically hostile as possible.
It seems to me that a HUGE benefit to the single sided LP's would be not having to put the playing side down on the platter.
If no-one bought them, them they would not exist for very long. 45 rpm long play have been around for many years.. they just are making more of them because somebody is buying them. (I own zero.. except a few 45rpm 12" singles)
I would think it would not matter? As for me, no-one is forcing me to buy any, and thus I could care less.. After all.. I spend my money on used LPs (though the used CD market is spectacular right now for buyers.. with a huge number of used CDs at $1 or $2 a pop. I have been filling in my Rock and Roll collection with hundreds of five star (All Music Guide) rated CDs.)
Chayro, I'd say quite a few, they tend to sell very very well. It doesn't interest me, I don't have that kind of money. But many people do.
I've heard a few Blue Notes, and yes, they do sound great.
Since you don't own any I'm not sure what your rant's about, but have fun with it anyway....