SME 312S versus SME V-12


These are SME's two 12" arms. The difference is that the 312S has a detachable headshell for azimuth/cartridge swapping and static VTF while the V-12 has a fixed headshell/continuous arm tube and dynamic VTF.

Has anyone heard and compared these arms to each other? I just retested static versus dynamic VTF on my SME V arm and prefer the dynamic, so that may answer my question, but I'm curious to read what others think of these two arms as I've never heard them. Thanks.
peterayer
Mauidj - The Fozgometer is worth its cost. It is quick, easy to use, and very accurate. Anyone that wants to get the azimuth right should have one. I too am interested to see what the Cartright will offer, given its extra cost, when it finally reaches the market.

A point to note if using third party set up devices and not the specific SME protractors with these arms is that the V12 is LofgrenA/Baerwald IEC and the 312S is effectively Lofgren A/Baerwald DIN.

In other words they have different nulls.

John
.
.

Mauidj

No, I wouldn't think so.

It's just so you are aware of it and that it might affect your choice if you want a particular alignment for whatever reason.

John
Peter,

Looking around the internet for details on the SME V12 tonearm I came across this image:

http://www.takajun.net/video/111204/11.jpg

I believed one the advantage of the SME V-12 over SME 312S was a solid continuous run of silver tonearm wire from the cartridge clips to DIN connection at the tonearm base.

This image appears to show removable headshell leads, making the electrical connection identical to 312S other than removable headshell aspect.

Opinion?