Pros and Cons of "Staying with" Analog and Vinyl


After having various turntables over the last 40 years, I am seriously considering getting out of analog. The "vinylists" argue that analog playback sounds more natural, musical, and provides more of an emotional response. I have experienced this feeling several times while listening to my modest vinyl collection, and tend to agree....until I begin hearing pops, clicks, surface noise. I keep my vinyl generally clean and protected

However, after listening to the 40th anniversay edition of Jethro Tull's "Aqualung" I am more convinced that analog is just not worth the time, money and, maintenance. The dynamics on new Aqualung are superb and there seems to be much more detail to what I remember of the Mobile Fidelity remastered recording

I have a modest analog set-up Rega P3-24 with their upgraded PS and the Dynavector 10X5 MC. I was on the verge of upgrading to the new Rega RP-6 which includes a newly design PS, and a choice of color plinths. Even with a generous trade-in value offered by the dealer, I would still be putting in about $1300 + which would get me into the Dynavector DV 20MKII ( above their 10X5.)

I personally don't see the value regardless of the sonic qualitative edge of analog. Maybe, the money could be spent elsewhere or not at all. BTW, I am not getting into computer audio, and am STILL not convinced that a BASIC DAC will bring me closer to analog sound quality. Members have recommended Peachtree's DACIT, and even the supposedly new and improved Musical Fidelity V-DAC II. I have a Rega Apollo player. A great sounding player, but it has its flaws.

Therefore, I would like to hear the pros and cons of staying with analog....or just dumping it. Thanks
sunnyjim
Sunnyjim , your at the same point I was a few years back. Finding a suitable CD player and DAC was the key, and after much toiling I did find just the right combination, do they sound like analog? of coarse not, but digital has many virtues .
Vinyl noise tends to be music genre-specific and/or equipment-related.

In this regard, recordings of solo performances such as solo piano tend to be problematic, as opposed to boisterous rock / pop recordings, which almost always out-shout noise.

As for the role of equipment, some cartridges and styli emphasize surface noise. Elliptical styli, which are used on the vast majority of modern cartridges, have a small contact area and wear a trough at the contact patch in the groove, and the trough gets worse as a record is played repeatedly. High-tech line-contact styli, on the other hand, are basically shaped like the groove and touch much more of the groove, playing parts of the groove that have never been played before and that have experienced no wear - depending upon the geometry, they can ride over the trough cut in the groove by elliptical styli and make even very used records sound new. Also because of the much greater contact area, line-contacts cause much less wear (the pressure is distributed over a much larger part of the groove wall, greatly decreasing wear). The following link shows a picture of the forerunner to the line contact, a Shibata, compared to an elliptical (scroll down to the black and white photo):

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=9OEDAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA66&dq=phono%20cartridges&pg=PA66#v=onepage&q=phono%20cartridges&f=false

Modern high-end tables tend to have very little rumble and thus minimize noise compared to modest tables or mass-market vintage tables.

Poor cartridge set-up, which is extremely common and the biggest problem with vinyl in my opinion, can greatly increase noise. In fact, it is precisely the line-contacts that are hard to set up, as they can only lay in the groove one way to fit - imagine a big "V" sitting down into a little "v" (it won't "work" unless it sits just right in the vertical and horizontal planes).

As for PCM digital, it's fine for low frequency and midrange signals, as such frequencies oscillate relatively slowly compared to PCM's 41,100 times per second sample rate - taking 41,100 "snapshots" per second of, for example, a signal that cycles up and down only 400 times per second (a 400 Hz. signal) will capture such a signal's path with great accuracy, but a 41,100 per second sample rate is inadequate for high frequency signals oscillating at close to the same speed as a the sampling rate - it fails to capture most of the arc of the signal, which is why a PCM recording of orchestral music, with all of the high frequency overtones coming off the string section, sounds unnatural and fatiguing on a high-resolution system. Imagine a camera with a slow shutter speed trying to photograph a jet aircraft or bullet in flight.

Vinyl noise tends to be separate from the music, while PCM digital's problems are woven into the fabric of the music - it's like somebody pissed in the soup and then osterized it. In any event, a reasonably clean LP of most types of music played on a good quality table and cartridge that have been properly set-up, especially where the cartridge uses a line-contact stylus, will not present noise problems (... but I'm the first to admit that all of those conditions need to be present).
Mlsstl, I've found vinyl recorded to digital really close to the original vinyl, also. I don't want to make blanket statements on format based on that, though. There is a huge amount of digital out there that does not equal vinyl. By having analogue around, we have something to compare digital to(Just like live.). I believe it helps both formats.
I think what Hoopster was hinting at with suspended subchasis turntables(or at least one advantage that I've heard)is that the noise(clicks, pops, etc.)is put into a different plane from the music. So, when you listen to the music, you don't hear the noise.
I enjoy vinyl so much more than cds (cds are nice for the car but are being replaced by mp3 players which are even better for the car) I buy all new releases on vinyl, seek out re-releases and buy used lps as often as I can. I only buy a cd when the vinyl is not available-for example Lisa Hannigan's new release. Occationally when my wife plays aa cd and Im in the other room, I can instantly tell its a cd not vinyl because the cd is less life like.