Power Cord Flavors

Thanks John - that helps.

I have just posted a mini review discussing sonic differences caused by Epiphany and Shunyata Python Helix VX on an Esoteric X-01. See:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?fcabl&1126432063&openmine&zzGuidocorona&4&5#Guidocorona
rather than classifying neutral the one and warm the other or viceversa, I would characterize the Epiphany as openly energetic and the Python Helix as 'balanced'.

Is there a difference between balanced and neutral? If so, please explain.

By openly energetic are you implying the Epiphany cord exaggerates the sonics, and is therefore neither neutral nor warm?

TVAD, I guess the reason why I do not like the word neutral very much is that it has a certain connotation of lack of character, which is something I would never accuse the Epiphany nor the Python Helix of.
In my view the Epiphany has a lot of transient energy, reasonably well distributed, and only slightly shifted towards the treble compared to the Python Helix VX. This makes the Epiphany particularly well suited for music of a percussive nature, especially where higher pitch percussion instruments are used, or whenever its especially open tymbre is desired. The only situation where the slight softening of bass register transients could have been perceived as a problem was in a slight lack of resonance from the lower two piano octaves in fast passages or chords.
However, this energy shift towards the upper register appears to me more pronounced in sustained notes. In particular, I noticed that in Rostropovitch's performance of the Bach cello suites the G and C strings do not resonate sufficiently, assuming instead a wooden quality, while the d string, and even more markedly the A string in the upper plaing positions had become somewhat harsh and almost winy, as in Jargar Forte strings on some lower cost instruments.

Thanks, Guido. I wish I had your ears.