Ozzy, I agree generally with your comments, but you might find it beneficial to hang on to both (or own both). Why?
Venustas and Aqueous will perform differently when placed in different positions in the system chain. Also, they will positively or negatively affect the sound when used with different components. For example, When I owned an APL Denon 3910, I always used Aqueous from the APL to my preamp, and then Venuasts from the preamp to the amp. Now that I own an Exemplar Denon 3910, I find using the Venustas from the Exemplar to the preamp and the Aqueous from the preamp to the amp works best. While owning the APL, I once tried using two sets of Venustas and I hated the results...too "closed in". I also didn't care for two sets of Aqueous...too detailed and "in your face"". Now though, I might like two sets of Venustas, but I don't have another set to try.
The point is that while you might prefer the Aqueous now, you might prefer the Venustas later with different gear. They are both excellent.
Venustas and Aqueous will perform differently when placed in different positions in the system chain. Also, they will positively or negatively affect the sound when used with different components. For example, When I owned an APL Denon 3910, I always used Aqueous from the APL to my preamp, and then Venuasts from the preamp to the amp. Now that I own an Exemplar Denon 3910, I find using the Venustas from the Exemplar to the preamp and the Aqueous from the preamp to the amp works best. While owning the APL, I once tried using two sets of Venustas and I hated the results...too "closed in". I also didn't care for two sets of Aqueous...too detailed and "in your face"". Now though, I might like two sets of Venustas, but I don't have another set to try.
The point is that while you might prefer the Aqueous now, you might prefer the Venustas later with different gear. They are both excellent.

