Synergistic New Tesla Line...Any comments?

I agree we need to spend more time on marketing and the website. The fact is our passion and the energy of my company since Tesla has focused primarily on product development- it has been so much fun developing new technologies that we have had little time to document them on our website. After RMAF we are moving full steam ahead with a greatly expanded website which will cover Teslaplexes, QLS’s, all Tesla models, Galileo and Galileo spin off technologies. In the mean time I thank all of you who have shared your experiences and time with other audio enthusiasts.

Regarding options for Active Shielding here is the breakdown on the hierarchy of performance for Active Shielding.

Basic Active Shielding is achieved with the supplied MPC's for Active Cables.

The next move up in performance is the Quattro powered by either a Tesla T2 or T3 Active power cord.

The current highest performance for Active Shielding is achieved when all MPC’s are plugged into a QLS 6 or QLS 9 Quantum Tunneled Line Strip with either a T2 or T3 power cord powering the QLS and plugged into a PowerCell line conditioner. For most systems with a full complement of Active Tesla IC’s, SC’s, and PC’s an Active Tesla T2 or T3 power cord plugged into a QLS will be the power cord that yields the single greatest benefits of all Active power cords in your system.

After RMAF we will be launching the first spin off technology from our Galileo research program. A hand built Quantum Tunneled Galileo MPC. The Galileo MPC is point to point wired (no circuit board), uses Vishay capacitors and Quantum Tunneled diodes. It is Quantum Tunneled in a six step process- the transformer is first Quantum Tunneled on its primary winding and a second time on its secondary winding, the Vishay capacitor is Quantum Tunneled as are the diodes. Next the signal path is Quantum Tunneled as are all contact points- the two AC blades, the lead wires and connectors are all Quantum Tunneled. The net performance gain of Galileo MPCs on Tesla cables is significant and on par with the Enigma valve power supply for Active Shielding.

Regarding the Transporter, this is in the development stage but should offer the highest performance option when available. This will be a state-of-the-art system wide power supply for Active Shielding with lessons learned from the Enigma and the Galileo MPC development programs. As many have speculated it will also be expensive.

Yours in music,
Ted Denney III
Lead Designer / Owner Synergistic Research Inc.

I just moved my Precision AC from my QLS 9 and put it on my power amp, then moved my T3 from amp and put it on my Quattro, moved my T2 from Quattro and put it on the QLS9. Today I noticed the frontal sounstage moved towards me, sort of came alive and real. Surround effects became more noticeable and surrounding. I agree the T3 matches the Quattro better than the T2, no doubt. Thx Ted.

Regards Bacardi

Bacardi, The T3 UHC works great on the QLS-9 to power my entire HT system. It is better than just a regular T3. The T3 UHC is heavier than the T3 but looks about the same in size. It is less congested and seems to have the juice for an entire system.

As for your sub, I was suggesting you try a T3 power cord for your subwoofer and also the Tesla reference interconnect cable to go with it. They take a long time to settle down but the results are stunning. The T2 sub cable is just like the Phase II X2 but without the Quantum Tunnel and upgraded Tesla active shield.

As for your upgrade from the S.R Alpha Sterling (quantum tunneled) X2 cables you currently have, choosing the Pre to Amp cables also depends on what you are currently usiung from your main source to your pre. What is currently in that position? Than I can make recommendations.

Bave_B and Shellie, I tried the Morrows and compared them to Synergistic. The Morrows are the second best cables I have tried. Synergistic being tops. So I continue being a minion. ;-)

Ozzy, I agree with you. I rather have the convenience of the Quattro than the QLS for the active shields. I have all my shields powered by the Quattro using a T3 power cord. I compared it to the T2 and I preferred the T3. Also, I have both the QLS and the Quattro and I prefer the Quattro. The QLS is too long in length for my 2-channel system and all those MPC's are too messy. I plug my Quattro into my Powercell 10 SE and it works great. I dont notice a difference really.

Hey Ted, how about a simple Galileo Quattro? Which I think would appear neater and organized than a QLS and 6 Galileo MPC’s.

Understood Joeyboynj, they are similiar sounds in some ways but I feel the Morrows offer more color and harmonic complexity. It's all good:O)

Joeyboynj, I have Precision Reference RCA on my left/right interconnects & Alpha Sterling X2(quantum tunneled) on center and rears from amp to Pre. I have an Active Resolution Reference X2 Digital from DVD to Pre.

Also: Are the new mpc's called the Galileos? Are they better than the old mpc's???

In regards to my subwoofer, I'm running an old active Phase2 RCA and an Active Subwoofer AC Master Coupler power cord. I would like to upgrade them both.

Regards Bacardi