Will high price HDMI cable makes a difference?

Honestly, if you own a 1080P set, why are you so proud of buying cheap cables?
What have you compared the $5 ones too?

AVS Forum has debated and studied the issue to death. What rch is referring to, I believe, is the general consensus about HDMI cables. According to the legitimate videophiles (of which I am not one), HDMI cables are sending 0's and 1's. Therefore, you shouldn't see a distinction between the monoprice model and the super-pricey stuff.

People who have compared a wide range of HDMI cables have reached the same conclusion. As a result, the conventional wisdom seems to be...pay $5-10 for your HDMI cables, so long as they're 1.3 compliant and can pass a 1080P signal.

Rch, apologies if I'm misinterpreting/misstating your position.

My friend was using the stock HDMI cord that came with his satellite receiver. Image quality was poor. I suggested he upgrade his cable. He bought a $90 Monster Cable at Radio Shack (there was a cheaper Monster cable selling for around $30...this was middle of the line).

Picture quality *dramatically* improved. Night and day difference.

There is much snake oil in HDMI, dont waste your time on expensive cable.

funny people argued the same thing on digital out cable from cd transport to dac

yes it does make a difference