The Problem with Synergistic Research


The problem is one that a number of cable makers suffer from. I preface my remarks by noting this not a problem that is exclusive to Synergistic Research. I use SR as an example because I am more familiar with their cables than with the cables of other companies that have the same problem.

The problem is the cost of incremental improvements. SR makes some great products. But, in spite of their copy writing, not all SR products are great, IMO. Some SR products have made great improvements in my system -- like the Tesla SE Hologram D power cord. That having been said, in retrospect, despite the bally-hoo that surrounds SR product launches, most of their products have brought no more than incremental improvements to my system. Products from other cable companies have brought equal or greater improvements for me -- often at much lower cost.

The problem is that SR has such fast-paced marketing with products coming out at a gallop supplanting recently released products -- such as the SR line of PowerCell conditioners -- that I sometimes feel I have been left in the dust.

We cannot stop the relentless march of technology. But at the high price of most of SR's offerings one is often left with sense of being left out instead of left in when new products come on the heels of products one has just purchased. The SR trade-up program does not remedy this problem at all, IMO.

There are many other cable companies without fast-paced marketing that provide equal or better value for the money, IMO. Companies like Bybee, HiDiamond and Cardas. I am probably not the only one who feels as I do about SR and other companies with fast-paced marketing.
sabai
Regarding SR's trade-up policy, it is clearly a good deal for those who have the cash and who want to purchase more than one new SR product. But it puts those on a modest budget in a bind.

Firstly, when SR brings out a new product to replace a current product the latter has already depreciated in value by a significant amount due to the new product being introduced. OK, this is normal. But then SR requires you to purchase a product twice the value of the one you want to trade-up for.

So, for instance, if you want to purchase the latest version of the PowerCell, you have to purchase $10,000 in SR products to take advantage of the SR trade-up program. Well, that's a lot of money for many of us. And what if the PowerCell is the only product you wish to purchase? You are left with having to sell your PowerCell off on the glutted aftermarket where the price of PowerCells has dropped drastically.

You are lucky to get much more than $2000 for a used PowerCell these days on Audiogon. But you are better off in the end because if you do get $2500 for your PowerCell you have to come up with $2500 for the new PowerCell instead of $6500 with SR. In the end, unless you are really hot on a new SR product besides the PowerCell, you are much better off not going the trade-up route. It is no gift to customers of modest means.

SR might want to consider two options to make their policy user friendly to audiophiles of modest means. They could introduce an upgrade policy for some of their products such as the PowerCell. They could formulate a policy that does not require the purchase of a product that is fully double the price of the new product a customer wishes to purchase.

In the end, a more "understanding" policy would end up being be a win-win situation. It would not be as profitable for SR but it would come back to them in volume to make up for the lower mark-up. Most importantly, it would sow the seeds of goodwill. This act of generosity would be appreciated by many audiophiles and would end up bringing many happy customers to SR that they would not otherwise have seen. And, over time, the results would naturally be compounded.

These suggestions are meant to be helpful.
Sabai.... It is now getting very boring indeed. You sound like a persistent parrot. I'm sure everyone here gets your message regarding SR's policy. Move on if you don't like what they do.
Flashunlock,
Please note that I initiated this thread and the topic is The Problem with Synergistic Research -- but not exclusive to SR. Also, please note that not everyone who has posted on this thread may agree with you -- according to how they have responded here. You have the perfect right to your opinions.

This is not an urban pedestrian sidewalk where a disturbance has been caused and where the local constabulary comes by to bring order to the scene. I am merely a poster on Audiogon eliciting ideas. With all due respect, those who find this thread disturbing may easily avoid reading the posts here -- and they can easily move on to threads that do not disturb them.
Sabai

True as it may seem but you are a very busy man here on the Audiogon forum. If you read back on this thread I have also posted that I agree with you in some ways but come on..... this has been long and your opinion/points has been put acrossed. IMO, SR will not change their policies just because you are moaning and that is exactly what you are doing. My recommendation is to listen to more music and less time spent hitting the keys. Enjoy what you have that were great upgrades yesterday and if you feel the need to do so again then buy carefully in your case. I too have purchased many Hi-Fi equipment/ cables/ tweaks blind because I'm also across the world and if I get it wrong then I'll sell them and if I have bought them too expensive then thats life and bad luck. If one moans for every bad judgement that they make or come across your situation, one should just give it all up because you know what, sometimes all of these are learning curves and in a way makes it fun.

Ted has welcomed you to contact him to resolve any issues so why not take up his offer instead of constantly posting here which ultimately will not do you or Ted any favours IMO.
Lock,

Your thoughts on Sabby moving on only fires him up to continue on with his writings. He will not drop his ways.