Aesthetix Io-Reliability Problems???

Thanks Bud for your post. What Bud says is also very important to me. I have a system which is on the dark sounding side already. I had the impression that the Callisto, as delivered with the stock tubes, might be a little on the dark side as well. If anyone agrees that either the Callisto or Io is a little warm sounding with the stock tubes, was anyone able to bring out the upper midrange life, breadth and beauty of either of these units with tube changes?

Responding to the request by Hungryear, a second power supply adds to the Aesthetix's sense of ease and effortlessness. There is an significant increase in both the intensity and headroom, while allowing each individual instrument ( particularly piano ) to show off all their colors and micro dynamics. This change does not appreciably alter the tonal balance, compared to the single supply. It does increase the depth of the soundstage, and with a better sense of location. This increased resolution is not the hyper variety, it does this by it untangling similar sounds, and providing a precise location within the listening space. With both my Io and Callisto running dual power supplies, this is the most dynamic and effortless presentation I have ever had. For this to make sense from a financial standpoint, all the other pieces in the system must be able to resolve this improvement. Regarding the comments by Bud and Rayhall, the 6922 Sovtek would be my first change. For additional midrange and air, try the Siemens 6922 CCa or the Amperex US Military 7308 CEP. If either of these produce too much midrange presence, try the Mullard 6922 (gold pin). Realize, that when you upgrade to one of these higher resolution NOS 6922's you are listening with more intensity to the weaknesses of the remaining (original) tubes. You are judging the replacement, plus all that it exposes downstream. If after changing to the CCa or CEP, you find that there is too much "grit" in the sound, try swapping the 6SN-7 as described in my long post. After that, if you are feeling adventuresome, trade out the first stage 12AX7 tubes (Io only). Note, these 12AX7's are the ones I warned about, get TESTED, ultra noise tubes for this position. My first choice and the most beautiful sound is the Telefunken 12AX7. Other options are the RCA 5751, a US Military version of the 12AX7. The 5751 will alter the tonal balance somewhat, as it is not an exact replacement. There will be a slight loss in gain, with improved signal to noise and lower distortion. Overall, the sound will be a bit more on the dry side. One final suggestion would be the 12AX7 French Mazda. A good sample of this will produce significant improvements in high frequency transparency, especially compared to the Sovtek. However, the Mazda has not been without problems in my experience. The samples I received are not equally reliable or equally low noise. Some will play perfectly for many months while retaining their original "voice" while other samples will develop horrible microphonics and tube noise in as little as a week. This is a situation that could lead to disappointment with the Io, when in fact, the tubes are the culprit. Unfortunately, there must be some risk and experimentation within your own system to determine what is best. All the tubes I have suggested here are expensive to buy right now and will become even more so as time goes by. You should never consider their purchase as a potential mistake. If these tubes do not work in your system now, there will come a time when they will be the perfect answer.

Albert, I've been downrated in this thread, when expressing my respect and my thanks for sharing your expertise with us, but I'll do so again, becuase though you did not address me directly, you have helped me a lot to understand better.

I've been asked by Rush Paul to contribute my experiences with the Io. I purchased the Io w/attenuators in early 1998 from my dealer in Denver. This was prior to the numerous favorable reviews in rags like TA$, etc, which caused Jim to be swamped with orders.

While I may differ on some tube choices, I agree with Albert Porter that the unit benefits greatly from NOS tube replacement. The choices will rely personal taste and require experimentation.

With respect to reliability, I experienced only one problem in the two years I owned the Io. I had inadvertently left the unit on for several days and the left channel went out. I emphatically disagree with leaving it on 24/7 unless you are providing your on clean power.

If you've been under the hood of the Io, you will see that Jim has used both plate voltage regulation (SS) and constant current sinks to better linearize the cathode followers. These devices, unlike tubes, can fail instantly with line spikes. My Io was plugged directly into the wall outlet (dedicated circuit) because there isn't an "audiophile" power "conditioner" out there that doesn't limit dymanics. Obviously, the unit had seen some trash on the line and it took out the first stage VR and CCS. Jim fixed the unit rapidly under warranty.

I sold the Io in February, 2000, to the reviewer for Ultimate Audio and it was used in the UA review. At the time, I considered it the premier commercial unit available.

Can the Io be bettered? Absolutely! Anything built to a price point can be bettered.

I think there is likely only one commercial unit on the market that would exceed the Io's performance, and that's the Wavac phono designed by the late Nobu Shishido. I don't know how much longer that unit will be available since Hirata Electric closed their Tango transformer division last October. The Wava uses a Tango step-up on the inputs and the excellent low impedance Tango LCR RIAA module. The use of high quality transformer and inductors in the EQ is a far superior approach to the typical stringing together of CF gain stages.

IMO, there is no unit using transistors at any price that would even merit consideration in the breath as the IO and the Wavac unit.

The preamp I am currently using is a variant on the Soul Sister (line) and Groove Thang (phono) published in the e-zine VALVE. (www.bottlehead.com). It has a custom step-up at the inputs (1:20, from Sowter in the UK wound
with wire from PHY-HP in France). Those feeds a first stage 6ER5/EC95 (a frame grid single triode) that is actively loaded (CCS) and shunt regulated
with a pair of 0D3 gas regulator tubes. Passive RIAA that employs correctly the 3.18 uS time constant between that and the second 6ER5, also actively loaded with a shunt reg. The phono section is cap coupled to a single 76 (again actively loaded and shunt regulated) in
the line section. Output is transformer coupled in parallel feed topology using a MagneQuest nickel core line output tranny (15K:500). Power supply is separate and is larger than the Io's. Completely dual mono, including
separate AC cords. Separate, DC current-regulated heater supplies for each stage and channel and no electrolytics in the B+ rail.

Better dynamics and a greater ease of presentation than the Io. Does all the ersatz "audiophile" tricks the reviewers fawn over, but also gets, most importantly, tone and timbre correct, which is a weakenss of the Io by comparison. Pace, rhythm and timing are set by the musicians and are free of the constrained and slightly sluggish presentation of commercial units. In short, there's more there there.

Those interested in this DIY apprach and the planned revisions to the preamp described above, feel free to e-mail. I'm not an Audiogon member and do not frequent the board, so replies here will likely go unseen.

That reviewer for UA has in turn sold the Io due to what he perceives as long term reliability problems. What these long term problems are is anyone's guess. While I'm sure the Io can be bettered, it is still a phono stage to be reckoned with and in my experience with atleast 7 other top stages, the best out there. Obviously, my experience is far more limited than others.