Rowland 8TiHC vs. Lamm M1.1

Jmr, You made an interesting observation about the MC6. One thing that JRDG mentioned over the phone was the reason why the 8TiHC sounds better than the 8Ti is that there are more output devices and so each device is less "stressed." I believe (I need to clarify this with JRDG) the MC6 has the same number of output devices as the 8TiHC. If you are correct in your argument then the 8TiHC should sound better than the MC6 in a two-channel application. I am not sure if the 8Ti would sound better than the MC6. I am guessing, but I bet they would sound very similar. The MC6, 8Ti and the 8TiHC all share the same power supply. Cheers, Dan

Dan, you are right in that the three should have a similar character in their sound. But remember that in this hobby even small improvements cost a lot of $. I would be caution about JRDG answer to your inquiries, I think that the MC6 is more a product of a marketing strategy than of true sonic improvement. That may be also why the denial to further upgrade the 8T. In my opinion a poor strategy, I think Rowland users had a great product loyalty in part because JRDG also was loyal to them. That appears to be changing. Anyway in my case I've decide to go the Lamm way.I am getting a pair of M1.1 next week, I'll let you know how it goes. Regards,Jose.

Jose, Good luck with the Lamms. I would be very interested to hear your opinions about them. Later this year I will be in the same boat you are now - trying to decide between these two amps and possibly others. Please keep us posted. Cheers, Dan