Martin logans or Dali Euphonia

To tell you a little more about my system,the amp is a Simaudio titan 7,proc is for now B&K ref 50,soon to be replace for a krell hts 7.1,velodyne HGS 18.harmonic tech pro silk III.DH lab Q-10 speaker cable.ps audio p-1200 power plant.

I apologize if my first post was a bit trite. I must admit to being surprised by the question because I find the two speakers present music so differently.

I agree with Darrell that the MLs are far more transparent, soundstaging is better (if well set-up), and the crossover is single-point rather than multiple point which can make a difference. As Darrell noted, set up is all important with MLs - in my opinion the biggest reason why ML owners switch is that they have not set them up properly. If properly done (set-up, upstream component matching, proper cabling, room treatments), MLs really sound wonderful. The Dalis are nice but I have not had a "magic moment" with them the way I have many times with MLs.

Guys,what about the revel salons line with center channel and surround? what will be the diference against the ML?dont forget,this is a 100% home theater set up.

thanks for all the imputs,so far.

any more imputs?

I`d go with Revel for home theater set up.