You really should get the speakers, and then match the amp!
What most do, like you're going, is backwards (I speak from 15 years and 6 audio stores worth of experience, and then some).
Many, such as yourself, get to attached to gear, and then think of the speakers as after-thoughts!
Get the speakers that work the best for your needs, room, budget, set up, etc. Then, match an amp/pre and source, then cabling, line conditioning, tweaks, whatever....my suggestion.
The RXV2400 is a bit dull when you engage the EQ parameter into the mix, so beware. That said, the Yamaha's are "usually" a bit hollow in the mid, slightly cool, dynamically a tad lean, and somewhat agressive on top(sometimes bright), compared to other traditionally warm sounding more full bodied receivers in that price range(like Denon). If you are indeed staying with the 2400, and don't want to look at other routs (I strongly recommend Outlaw Separates, which destroys your receiver sonically).
But then it's relative to your speakers characteristics ultimately.
I've liked Yamaha's neat DSP modes, which were generally much better than others. Also, as a pre/pro, the Yamaha's where generally clean, detailed, and uncolored, and sounded infinitely better when you added an outboard amp to them!
Still, on it's own, at the very least, the amp section will hold back any real potential sonic quality. That, and I've yet to hear any receiver's Parametric or "automatic" EQ work so well ultimately, in regards to improving sonics!. It seems the sound (digitally) becomes too processed in the mid and upper(in the case of the Yamaha, tamming "air" and "extension" in the treble).
Back to your question; I would mate speakers that are a bit warm and fat(although you can make a fatter bass-heavy sound by placing the speakers and seats for better bass coupling), and maybe more foreward. Speakers like Klipsh's come to mind. Maybe you'd like the Polk's, which are often warm. When using the EQ on your 2400, you might also find the polks brightness uptop to mate oK.(some).
Still, I remember that the bigger floor standing, VERY EFFICIENT AND SENSITIVE KLipsch SB or Ref series speakers you buy at "Best Buy" or "Goodguy's" and such should do well with your limited powered receiver sonically. I think you might check this out if you are staying with you're receiver. The limited power your receiver has current-wise will be more than made up for with the easy to drive Klipsh's.
If you are going with more pristine, delicate, even audiphile speakers out there, with lower sensitivity, I'd suggest a minimum of Denon, but strongly considering separates, like I suggested! OTherwise, YOu're ok with the likes of the more highly touted B&W's, or Paradigms I supose.
good luck
What most do, like you're going, is backwards (I speak from 15 years and 6 audio stores worth of experience, and then some).
Many, such as yourself, get to attached to gear, and then think of the speakers as after-thoughts!
Get the speakers that work the best for your needs, room, budget, set up, etc. Then, match an amp/pre and source, then cabling, line conditioning, tweaks, whatever....my suggestion.
The RXV2400 is a bit dull when you engage the EQ parameter into the mix, so beware. That said, the Yamaha's are "usually" a bit hollow in the mid, slightly cool, dynamically a tad lean, and somewhat agressive on top(sometimes bright), compared to other traditionally warm sounding more full bodied receivers in that price range(like Denon). If you are indeed staying with the 2400, and don't want to look at other routs (I strongly recommend Outlaw Separates, which destroys your receiver sonically).
But then it's relative to your speakers characteristics ultimately.
I've liked Yamaha's neat DSP modes, which were generally much better than others. Also, as a pre/pro, the Yamaha's where generally clean, detailed, and uncolored, and sounded infinitely better when you added an outboard amp to them!
Still, on it's own, at the very least, the amp section will hold back any real potential sonic quality. That, and I've yet to hear any receiver's Parametric or "automatic" EQ work so well ultimately, in regards to improving sonics!. It seems the sound (digitally) becomes too processed in the mid and upper(in the case of the Yamaha, tamming "air" and "extension" in the treble).
Back to your question; I would mate speakers that are a bit warm and fat(although you can make a fatter bass-heavy sound by placing the speakers and seats for better bass coupling), and maybe more foreward. Speakers like Klipsh's come to mind. Maybe you'd like the Polk's, which are often warm. When using the EQ on your 2400, you might also find the polks brightness uptop to mate oK.(some).
Still, I remember that the bigger floor standing, VERY EFFICIENT AND SENSITIVE KLipsch SB or Ref series speakers you buy at "Best Buy" or "Goodguy's" and such should do well with your limited powered receiver sonically. I think you might check this out if you are staying with you're receiver. The limited power your receiver has current-wise will be more than made up for with the easy to drive Klipsh's.
If you are going with more pristine, delicate, even audiphile speakers out there, with lower sensitivity, I'd suggest a minimum of Denon, but strongly considering separates, like I suggested! OTherwise, YOu're ok with the likes of the more highly touted B&W's, or Paradigms I supose.
good luck