Is computer audio a bust?


In recent months, I have had several audio acquaintances return to CDPs claiming improved SQ versus their highly optimized computer transports (SS drives, external power supplies, etc, etc).

I wanted to poll people on their experiences with computer "transports." What variables have had the most impact on sonics? If you bailed on computers, why?

I personally have always believed that the transport, whether its a plastic disc spinner or computer, is as or more important than the dac itself and thus considerable thought and energy is required.

agear
Jesusa0,
A good friend has brought several well regarded players/DACs to my home and so far he always prefers the Yamamoto YDA in the end. It very much flies under the radar.
Charles1dad, I just read the 6Moons review. Wow! I didn't have time to note what chip is in it, but I would love to hear it.
Hi Tbg,
I believe it uses the TI(Burr Brown) 1794. The key to its sucess IMO is the ultra simple discrete analog circuit(Yamamoto avoids Op amp/NFB at all cost he says). Minimal use of filters and his emphasis on power supply and heavy duty transformer. He placed attention on implementing a very minimalist design which he feels yields a natural sound quality. It's exceptionally organic and lively.
Charles,
Charles1dad, while I like avoiding Op amps and his other emphases, I need the Sabre chip for my music server and it double DSD.

Thanks for the information.
Tbg,
I understand. My belief is what ever it takes to sound good for "you". Its just become that simple for me.
Charles,