Pbb, I am most happy to explain my use of the paradigm shift between digital replay and vinyl replay, however please do not be presumptuous enough to think that it is for everyone's edification. You asked the question, so it is for your benefit. The ultimate paradigm, at least for those exposed to it, is live music. All reproduced sounds must be compared to it and their strengths and weaknesses filtered through our value systems to arrive at what we feel is closest to that paradigm. Unfortunately, many do not listen to very much music and some, even though they do, do not feel that it is the goal of music reproduction in the home. The paradigm for many has become compact disc replay. In these cases LP replay suffers in the areas that we all know too well, noise, pitch stability, leading edge resolution, ease of use, etc. The problem is that we see only LPs weaknesses because the paradigm is digital replay, that which most listeners are most familiar with at this time. But turn the tables and one can focus on LPs strengths, again we are all too familiar with them, soundstaging, dimensionality, ease of presentation, harmonic integrity. Not that, as you would have us believe, one is right and one is wrong. In my thoughts they both pale equally when compared to live, unamplified music. But it is a matter of preference, there is no absolute answer. I find LP replay easier to listen to. I am sure that the surface noise will drive some out of the room. Let's remember, however we get there, we are all on the journey because of our overwhelming love of music.
Marty
Marty

