Under rated speakers due to price....?


AND the resulting associated equipment?

I have a theory and am interested what others think about it. Is it possible that we underrate some speakers because they sell for a reasonable price and therefor listen to them with similar equipment?

I have a decent system consisting of the Rowland integrated amp, SCD-777ES and normally Aerial Model 6 speakers with a Storm III. I have frequently purchased many "cheap" speakers for second systems and I always try them in the good system just for kicks. Some sound OK, but some sound great. I recently tried a pair of less than $300 (Circuit City price) Polk RT35i speakers in the good system and could not believe how awesome they sounded for 1/10 the price of the Aerials. I could easily see some new high end company selling a similar sounding product for 5 times the price and getting it with happy customers.
I then thought about it - - how often do you hear about 2-500 dollar speakers being paired with a 10k system? Has anyone ever checked the associated equipment in Stereophile's class A speakers against the class B or C's? I didn't have the patience. But I bet as a rule that exotic speakers like Grand Utopias or Pipe Dreams are NOT listened to with low hi-end equipment like the lesser speakers are. If you pair some Vandersteen 2c's or B&W CDM-1's with Boulder amps, (and list the speakers at 10 grand) might people call them "some of the best?"
jimmy2615
The reverse happens also. Great speakers will reveal the weakness in electronics and many people blame the speakers. Somewhere in Audioreview is someone who bashed the Nautilus speakers because they sounded crappy played through his Yamaha receiver system.
Stereophile rates the speakers against each other useing class "A" electronics, then they place them in the catagory they feel is appropriate. I do think that alot of speaker owners never realize their speakers full potential because they mate them with poor quality electronics. However it would not make much sense to pair 2-$500. speakers with a 10K system, because they would become the weak link in the chain, and you would not hear all of your 10K worth of system. The old silk purse from a sows ear type of thing. Just MHO. TG
I think maybe the point Jimmy is making is that good speakers that have no major sins of commission, will continue to improve in quality when mated with very good electronics. I have had the same experience recently, substituting a pair of Linn Indexes for the Vandersteen 2cis I have in my main system. The Linns sounded surprising good with a system in which the digital source, preamp and amp EACH retailed for about 2.5-3x the price of the speakers. Sure you won't get the great results when you bring the speakers up to the level of the electronics, but I believe that the results would generally be better than the converse; speakers much higher end than electronics and source.
I agree with Sugarbrie regarding B&W speakers.
I own a pair of B&W Nautilus 805's and have found
that they perform well beyond their price point when
paired with good electronics (within reasonable bounds).
I did not observe a similar improvement / sensitivity
to electronics from Vandersteen model 3s.
I agree with cornfedboy, a fly your ointment there is. best worst < review I've heard