Thanks folks, appreciate the insight. If I can redirect however, and get your additional input, I should have been more clear perhaps. Since I can not audition speakers I was hoping to do so through anyone willing to offer their experiences - - by proxy if you will. I have been exposed (through reading and experience) to most of the previous posts' philosophies.
I prefer my Aerials by the way. The Totems I listened to were great, hooked up to Myriad electronics and in what I thought was an excellently prepared room. I have a Sony SCD player and the Rowland integrated. Debate over quality of electronics may be pertinent, but I thought the Totems really sounded great - just not my taste, though I will confidently say female vocals sound more realistic through my system.
The Totem sound was holographic (I wondered what people were talking about before I heard these) without any irritants, and decent bass. Somehow the whole thing seemed less solid though. (Similar to Soliloquy? - have not heard them).
So, if anyone can tell me what they have auditioned and what it sounded like, compared to something else, that would be great (every review in a magazine should do this I think)! I realize speaker timbre is a matter of taste, but there can't be more than a dozen general "types" of speaker sounds, if not less, and within each group the "better" performers. For example, in a post I just read, someone said that the Avalon Eidelons had a very open soundstage compared to the emphasis on center focus of B&W's best offerings. This is a very similar comparison I have made between the Totem and Aerials, respectively. It would be nice for those of us who can not audition them to know the sound of, and differences between, for example Utopias, Eidelons, Salons, etc. etc., and even as compared to 2k speakers.
I realize that's a lot to ask and brings about some question of ambiguity and generalization, so thanks if you care to offer your words....!