Hi Tom,
Tom asks: "Are there no losses in conversion?"
Converting to what?
If you are asking about the conversion from mechanical energy to thermal energy in the vibration control system I described the answer is yes, there is a great deal of loss which is the objective.
"If you let it vibrate, like it will do anyway, no matter what and you provide a efficient path way for vibration to exit would there not be be less loss than high mass dampening?"
You are right. There is LESS loss of mechanical energy when coupling is employed. What we want is MORE loss of energy so that it will have less effect on the signal that is flowing thorough the component.
"Some coupling devices have a geometric bandpass at 4hz and below to reject the incoming at the point tip"
Which coupling products manufactured for audio systems have resonant frequency and bandpass at 4Hz and below? Are there measurements to show this?
Please let me know if I had understood your questions correctly.
Best Regards,
Barry
Tom asks: "Are there no losses in conversion?"
Converting to what?
If you are asking about the conversion from mechanical energy to thermal energy in the vibration control system I described the answer is yes, there is a great deal of loss which is the objective.
"If you let it vibrate, like it will do anyway, no matter what and you provide a efficient path way for vibration to exit would there not be be less loss than high mass dampening?"
You are right. There is LESS loss of mechanical energy when coupling is employed. What we want is MORE loss of energy so that it will have less effect on the signal that is flowing thorough the component.
"Some coupling devices have a geometric bandpass at 4hz and below to reject the incoming at the point tip"
Which coupling products manufactured for audio systems have resonant frequency and bandpass at 4Hz and below? Are there measurements to show this?
Please let me know if I had understood your questions correctly.
Best Regards,
Barry

