2. digital
  3. 1382330862

Weiss is so underrated

I have had the Weiss DAC 202 in my system for about a year now being used in a very ambitious and high resolution system. But then I got that typical audiophile itch and given that this DAC was the lowest priced component in my system, I thought that it was time for me to focus on a new DAC. So with the help of some friends and a local deal I got the following DACs to try in my system for an extended period of time: Berkeley Audio DAC 2 + Alpha USB, Calyx Femto, PS Audio PerfectWave DAC2 and DCS Vivaldi.

The Berkeley was the most analog sounding DAC and had great image focus. In comparison when inserting the Femto I could immediately hear a slight loss of focus on the location of instruments or voices. The Berkeley also has a very little electronic signature in high frequencies which is very impressive, especially at this price point.

The Femto DAC is quite an impressive machine with a well balanced sound. It is a substantial leap over the PS Audio DAC in every way. The Femto has a sound that should work well in virtually any system although it is a little on the dry side. But ultimately it's lack of tight focus of images bothered me.

While the Berkeley has a terrific analog sound and no matter how much you dissect it there is very little if anything that one can fault about his DAC, there is something about it that I found just doesn't suck you into the music. I often found my attention wandering and being distracted while listening to it.

The Vivaldi is by far the most expensive in the group and while it was impressive at a lot of things, in particular how it was able to remain composed during complex passages, it has a certain bright sound that just sounds very artificial to me. It has that sound that is remarkable for audiophile demo discs, but when just listening to music you enjoy I found it to be disappointing overall.

The PS Audio doesn't even come close to any of the DACs in this group. It sounds lifeless, flat, and dull in comparison. Any experienced listener will hear this right away. Beautifully made machine with great specs, but it just doesn't deliver the musical goods at all. I would say that it sounds like kind of how CD players sounded in the early 90s.

But let me tell you, the Weiss despite its relatively low price point beat every DAC in this group, including the mighty Vivaldi. It's soundstage is absolutely massive, much wider and deeper than the other DACs which makes it feel like you are listening in a much larger space (the opposite of Berkeley). And then it also has this incredible airiness that is very special to hear. Images float on silky smooth and airy presentation which is supported by a very dynamic foundation. It is just a thrill to listen to this DAC. The bass is also the most dynamic (although not very deep) that I heard which gives everything far more rhythm and pace.

So the conclusion is the Weiss 202 is a very serious piece of equipment, a remarkable bargain, and probably one of the best DACs out there regardless of price. Has anyone else done an direct A/B comparison with the Weiss? Does your opinion mirror mine?
dweinstein
dweinstein OP
25 posts
 
Talk to any reputable dealer about PS Audio DAC. It's just not a high end device at all. There is nothing about its sound that is exceptional. Compared to almost any state of the art DAC it is completely flat, images do not lock in on the soundstage.

Hey, some people like Bose and some people like the PS Audio DAC.
levy03
425 posts
 
Dweinstein: you ask for opinions then go all loud mouth know-it-all on people who chime in?. you should have asked "who believes the crap i'm spewing"....then maybe those of us who know better wouldn't have upset the echo-chamber you prefer to live in. unlike your arrogant post...i had the decency to use the word "opinion" in my post. to bad i wasted some good decency on someone not worthy of it.

"it's just not a high end devise at all"??....proves you have little knowledge and even less class. go play with your Weiss and be happy brother. not gonna waste my time battling wits with someone who is unarmed.
bobf1717
14 posts
 
Forgot the question, but love the drama! Please continue, but first, anyone with any thoughts on wavelength?

BF
soix
2,133 posts
 
Nice that you've been able to compare to so many good competitors and still like yours best. I'd be very interested how a Bel Canto DAC3.5VB would compare to the Weiss if you ever get a chance.
almarg's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
almarg
8,673 posts
 
Foster_9 makes an excellent point. A comparison between a particular group of high quality DACs will likely yield different results in different systems.

Also, no mention has been made of what digital interface was used on the Weiss, which supports S/PDIF, AES/EBU, and Firewire. I assume that either S/PDIF or AES/EBU was used (probably AES/EBU), since some or all of the other DACs that were compared do not support Firewire.

Given that, some of the system-dependent variables and interactions that may affect the results include the risetime and falltime of the signal that is provided by the source component, which is almost never specified but can significantly affect jitter, in ways that have little predictability; the relationship between the length of the digital interconnect cable, signal risetimes and falltimes, and cable propagation velocity; the happenstance of how closely the characteristic impedance of the digital interconnect cable matches the impedances of the DAC and source component; the amount and the characteristics of digital noise that will be riding on the signal that is received from the source; the susceptibility of the DAC/source combination to ground loop-related noise; the ambient electrical noise environment; the jitter rejection capability of the DAC; the sensitivity of nearby components to digital noise that may be coupled from the DAC through the air or through the power wiring; and the data rate of the signal that is being conducted. And of course whether S/PDIF or AES/EBU is being used.

Regards,
-- Al
More to discover