It may be that active preamps often sound better.
The next question would be: why?
Synergy is always a consietation. Why would a good passive mated well be any lesser than with an active pre? Easier to mate correctly perhaps due to voltage and impedance matching? If that is done right, what secret ingredient is still missing?
There is usually a reason why some things work better than others.
Of course if a sub 1k passive can compete with the best active pres as some claim, that would be a significant thing.
The next question would be: why?
Synergy is always a consietation. Why would a good passive mated well be any lesser than with an active pre? Easier to mate correctly perhaps due to voltage and impedance matching? If that is done right, what secret ingredient is still missing?
There is usually a reason why some things work better than others.
Of course if a sub 1k passive can compete with the best active pres as some claim, that would be a significant thing.

