Finding 'The weakest link" in my stereo


So I ahve been pretty happy with my system. Decided to try aa new cable: Cardas Parsec. I wanted to replace the main sevenmeter run from preamp to amp, but decided to try a one meter Parsec first, just to see if it would be an upgrade or just a lateral move.

So i get the wire and stick in in my setup choosingthe link between my VAC Standard (I use it for a glorified tube buffer) and my pream Bryston BP-26.
The wire I had in there was some KCAG I had cut and with Kimber Ultraplate RCA.
So i am pleasantly impressed with the Parsec.
And didnot even realize the former cable was a "Weak Link".
Interesting.
(The immediate expereince was listeningto some hadyn string quartets (Naxos) from a box set, when the cable arrived via FedEx. So I put the new calbe in and immediately started listening.The big difference was the sound was not 'steely' as before. I thught it was just the recording was that way. Not so. Here it is the third day, and while listening to other items between, right now I am back to the Hadyn quartets box. and the sound is far more enjoyable. So good luck was found in buying the Parsec, and happening to choose the particular connection to change.

So what are you eperiences with finding the weak link in your cabling?

(i realize this whole post is not a question, but it is high time was started using these forums for more than newbie questions and perplexing problems. And I invite others to post things they find interesting.. So we can discuss the issues.)
elizabeth
I never subscribed to the theory of limiting the cost of my cables in comparison to the cost of my equipment. My weakest link has to be my Theta Intrepid amp but I can't convince myself to part with it.
Check all connections for proper polarity and try the interconnects in both directions to see which way sounds better. Not to mention fuses, each of which should be tried in both directions for best sound. All wire is directional.
Changing the driver tubes in my monoblocks from EH to GoldLion was a surprising upgrade in sound quality.Got rid of that last bit of annoying excess sibilance,and actually improved every other aspect as well.Nice when a small change works out so well!
I thought this thread was about cabling but after rereading, I'd like to add one more thing that I've found to be a huge improvement that's not cable related.

I've mentioned on another thread how my speakers are made: they're semi-open baffle and have three different sized openings on the rear (you can change the slats which in turn, change the opening) and when I completely removed them, the soundstage took a dramatic turn for the better.

I used the largest slat which had the smallest opening for bass reinforcement since my speakers only go down to 40Hz and then drop off rather quickly. After getting my Darwin Silver ICs, the bass went deeper and was better defined. Playing around with the tone controls on my Marantz added some more welcome bass without any real drawbacks.

Still being on the experimental phase, I went back to direct in (no tone control adjustments) and fiddled with the rear slats on the speaker.

Insert 'epiphany' here.

I'm guessing that when the opening on the rear is larger, the speaker acts more like a dipole and most likely something more that I can't figure out since the bass is better defined and just as deep as before and the images now seem to float, independent of the speakers and not have that projected quality. Details abound and notes seem to dissipate in more directions. The only analogy I can think of is things are no longer congested, which I never thought they were before. There is a freedom and naturalness to the sound that I really enjoy. Interaction between players is more convincing as well since things are a lot more coherent.

All in all, my biggest thrill of the year.

All the best,
Nonoise
Never hurts to try something different once in a while.It can be rewarding or at least interesting.Good thread Elizabeth!