The final Act in a study in preamps the ART 3


Tom Cruise is rescuing a female agent he trained in Mission Impossible 3. He finds her alive but weak . He needs her to jump up and save the world with him so he shoots her in the chest with a jolt of adrenaline . She was alive technically but now she instantly becomes superwoman..... for while anyway. Thus goes the saga of my latest personal occupation . The study of a few remarkable preamps.

I did an "impression" of the CJ Act 2. I then did a follow-up on the replacement , the Act 2.2. The 2.2 was the superwoman injected with the adrenaline to be sure. It certainly was capable of conquering the world with Tom but alas, the story takes another Hollywood twist : Enter the Conrad Johnson ART 3 .

This again is an impression piece and this starts a series of posts dedicated to resolving this work of ...." Art".

There will only be 25 made , half are already sold and at 25k , doesn't fit into many audiophiles budgets. I am lucky to be without kids , with an incredibly understanding wife and have the time, passion and patience to address this study competently. It has about 50 hours on it , hardly enough to press a key but what needs too be stated are a few obvious differences between the Act and Art series of valve preamps from Lew and Bill.

The system it is being evaluated in is as follows. Aerial 20 T main speakers , 2 Aerial SW 12 subs , Conrad Johnson LP 140 Monoblocs , APL Hi Fi NWO 2.5 Universal player , Kubala Sosna Emotion cables . Sound Application RLS conditioners , Sistrum stands.

The Art starts deeper in the Yin region initially than either Act siblings. The Acts ability to settle comfortably inside itself is really interesting to watch... or listen to. The Act fidgets around moving up towards neutral as it fleshes out its unique sonic character and strengths . Then it emboldens the midrange blooming luxuriously as the Teflon caps mature into something that draws you inside its world of color and speed. This phenomenon seems to settle it back into the yin where the midrange takes you ... " body and soul . " It never however loses its grip on transparency , immediacy , leading edge definition and ambience retrieval. The 2.2 however continues the evolution and struts its sonic wardrobe in unimaginable directions and leaves you passionately involved with your beloved music library.This is the moment we wait for : the connection to the music that literally moves you and keeps you glued to your seat for hours on end. It is simply what CJ is famous for. Whether I regret losing the 2.2 over the ART 3 will remain to be seen as the Act 2.2 was the best sounding preamp I have ever encountered by a wide margin . We will also see if the adrenaline pumping superwoman will be overcome by this intimidating newcomer that is threatening to bump her from Toms side . This will be interesting indeed . Stay tuned for progressive follow-ups to the final chapter in a 3 part series of preamplifiers from one of the most beloved audio companies ever formed . Conrad Johnson.

Brent Rainwater
brainwater
340 hours and I feel the Art 3 has started leveling out. I could be wrong however , time will tell. The ART 3 was growing in all directions. Steady and sure however. The Act 2 and 2.2 evolved in a more radical fashion . The Art 3 led you on a path that was always lit and relaxing. I retained a series of digital playback software that stayed in rotation so I could stay focused on this. The APL Hi Fi NWO 2.5 Universal player was my source and I feel its extended frequency response , linearity and resolution made the job of evaluating this preamp quite simple. As noted above , this preamp is already highly regarded by me so I will not belabor this issue.

The character was revealed at 100 hours as this was indeed a magical moment. 100 - 300 was characterized by a refinement in all aspects of the audio spectrum . Not unlike the Act 2.2 , after 100 hours , the frequency range from the upper midrange to the top octaves dramatically increased in focus, resolution and transparency. At first , I was somewhat relieved as the initial impression made me want for some of the dynamic impact and upper octave clarity that the 2.2 brought to the table. The ART 3 seemed to be far more relaxed and comfortable in its role of spotlighting the nuances of the midrange exuding a liquidity and rich harmonic glow to brass and strings in its initial phase of growth. This wonderful characteristic never faltered nor lessened at the expense of this newfound clarity and open window that was unfolding. Density of the upper octaves became apparent. The striking of metal , bells and cymbals now had not only a revealing presence that surpassed the 2.2 but also had a lingering sweetness that invited you into the field . This made listening to many various genres of music a newfound delight. I began bringing out Indian , New Age and Celtic recordings. I spent myself into the audio grave with Amazon.com . I was doing what i needed to do : get lost in the experience of music rather than being focused on the gear. That's harder to accomplish than it seems for audiophiles.

The depth continued to recede. Space from the front of the stage to the rear was expensive and layered. Bass control was without question superior to anything I have owner or auditioned. I simply cannot find fault with this preamp.

I will make a final addendum at 500 hours
I wanted to put this to rest with a final word that would capture this experience . Tie it up nicely , leave it open for others to enjoy and move on . I do not wish to come off as melodramatic in my gushing of praise and enthusiasm. I do on the other hand love what I am in the middle of and must explore with you the evolution a bit more.

I was wrong, it has not stopped improving and I am at 420 hours. I have in rotation a few discs I will list in my wrap up of this study but in particular , I am focused on Live From France , Patricia Barber. I play this disc in its entirety every night to begin the rotation and every night it sounds different. Emerging from the myriad of instruments that the band utilizes is a "stain of character " to each unique sound. The trite verbiage is "fleshing out the character " of the instruments as they become what they will be ultimately presented as from a given chain of components. What I mean by staining is that with this preamp, the nuances are so uniquely delineated and presented that they portray such a bold , identifiable texture that it becomes an indelible imprint you cannot mistake.... like a stain . Every spin of the disc unearths more of this and I cannot contain my admiration . As good as the ACT 2.2 is { and it is extraordinary } , the Art 3 is in another league.

I have friend that is a highly respected member of the audiophile community and Professor of Mathematics at the University of Iowa. John Lediaev is a man of dedication . He treats is body and mind like calibration instruments. His commitment to exacting the performance of his audio system is astonishing. His relentless pursuit of audio perfection is lead by his laser like focus on the accurate presentation of instrumental timbre. He attends live unamplified musical events often and he punctuates his fascinating stories of audio with analogies to his own experiences with his system . For the first time , I understand completely what he is so tantalized with.To listen to a musical passage that is dense with various unique and well recorded sounds and experience the lack of homogenized instrumental character is humbling .

The Teflon caps are maturing and the clarity , focus and separation of the space is evident. The result is a startling ability to walk through the space of the recording. Holographic and stable , the bodies , bells, cymbals ect ect are locked in a vacuum in front of you in your room . Each recording displays a completely different picture and its amusing to be able to easily hear the recording engineers purpose.

I am not sure I will conclude this soon as I am clearly in the presence of something that must be respected for what it is : a benchmark product.
Brent

Good to see you enjoying the ACT3.
I luved my pre 16, but did not care for ACT2 or CT5. Good to see CJ have dumped that 6h30 and gone back to some tonal warmth and musicality they are so famous for coupled with transparency
Hi Downunder. I know your feelings regarding the Act 2 and Ct5 , we have conversed before in private . I also respect you and your experiences with CJ.
I personally feel that that direction was a needed evolution and brought clarity and detail to the table. I also like the 6h30 and what it brought to the table. The balance however was a tricky one and the Act 2 was not successful at bridging the gap. The Ct5 was a move in the right direction as it brought dynamics and a solidity to the lower midrange and is a superior " best buy " IMO. The Act 2.2 however was a milestone achievement and is a musical , involving instrument of reproduction . Had I not heard the ART 3, I would have ended my quest there. I could never have imagined that the ART 3 would be this good .
Downunder , I wanted to expand on my comments above. I personally feel the direction is a positive one for specific reasons . The added clarity and resolution was an important step in the right direction IMO. The use of teflon caps and new topologies of the new CJ gear allows us to dig deeper into the music . We have all of these fabulous recordings to listen to and they are full of detail that must be dredged up to be appreciated. To lose this ability to see the entire sonic landscape at any expense isnt worth it to me. Fortunately , musical involvement is alive and well in the Act 2.2. The ART 3 strikes the perfect pose of maintaining staggering detail , rich midrange density, and frequency linearity from top to bottom . Add to this the ability to spotlight the minute color shadings of the instrumental timbre . This cannot be deleniated without this added resolution and cleaning of the sonic window. The trick is the balance.