SET amps and speaker sensitivity.


Hi there. Just for the aspect of learning and future knowledge, can a host of folks explain how to match SET amps like for example, the Lamm ML2.1's to speaker sensitivity.

We can even get away from the Lamms, really any SET amp. How do you match those to speaker sensitivity and what is the relationship between the two? What dB level is considered "sensitive."

Just curious and always wanting to learn!

Cheers,
Peter
mariasplunge
Read "Some Insight into Proper Speaker Selection" on Welbourne Labs website. See:http://www.welbornelabs.com/recomendspeaks.htm. You have to scroll down a bit to see it.
There is no hard and fast "right answer" but there are common guidelines. As swampwalker suggested, space/volume will have an effect. Speaker impedance (and how it varies by frequency) could also play a very strong role. Second, not all amps of X watts are created equally (power supplies may affect amp response to speaker load).

That said, I find the article to which Kehut refers above to be at best oversimplified and misleading, because I have think most speakers with 2x that sensitivity (87db/6ohms) would present trouble with the amp being reviewed with music which had real "needs" (Holst Planets' Saturn, Reger organ music, and the list could obviously go on). 845s are supposed to have more oomph at the low end than other SETs but my personal experience with SETS and relatively efficient speakers (96db on the bass, far more on the mids/tweets) is that one needs to test even higher-efficiency woofers with more power than recommended to see if one is getting the best out of the speaker. My experience with 96db woofers and 13 watts (despite a power supply I rate quite highly) suggested that to get real clarity out of the bass (and bass that goes deep with clarity makes the the rest of the spectrum stand out that much more - positively shiver-inducing in my book) I needed probably double or quadruple that at times. 100% of the time while listening to Mozart chamber music I would be fine. And even most of the time on orchestral music I would be fine, but when push comes to shove comes to tympanies pounding, cymbals crashing, and the organ in the background grinding out the low notes, I needed more oomph.

Of course, that and a dollar will get you a dollar cup of coffee.
Wow! great to have such an overwhelming response. The more I know, the more confused I get. I guess I am realizing that I might not even have a clear understanding of what an SET amp is.

I am assuming (again an assumption) that not all tube amps are SET amps. Could some of you give me some examples of SET amps. On that note, could some of you give examples of good speaker SET amp combinations that you have run across in your expereinces. Truly I am a novice here.

On another note, my room size is 22L by 13W by 8H. That in feet. Is this big enough to put a floor standing speaker in? I've read on other forums that this is a common mistake, trying to fit too big a speaker into too small ar room Any feedback would be appreciated.

And lastly, just to give polks and idea of what I am looking into for the distant, I mean far distant future, would be something like matching the audio aero prestige monoblocks or the lamm ml2.1's with a floor stander from focal like the alto ot nova utopia be. Any comments?

Thanks all,
Peter
Basically, unless your speakers are 93db or more efficient, forget the normal SET. I grant that there are more powerful and expensive output tubes that could be used with less efficient speaker, but few rival the sounds of 45, 50, 2A3, or 300B SETs.
In my experience there's a huge range of preferred loudness levels among different listeners.

Whether you listen at 70 dB average SPL or 90 dB average SPL will make a hundredfold difference in your amplifier power requirements.

So in my opinion, "this first - know thyself".

Duke