Pass Labs xa - .5 amps


Has anyone compared the new Pass XA-30.5 stereo amp to the XA-60.5 mono amps? Interested to hear your impressions. I am considering one (or two) these for use with my ML Vantage speakers. Thanks.

Bob R.
rmrobinson1957
I have used both the XA-30.5 and XA-60.5 on my 93dB/8 ohm speakers, and there is not an appreciable difference in sound between the two amps in my system. The XA-60.5 just play louder.

If the XA-30.5 aren't creating the sound you're after, I don't think switching to the XA-60.5 is going to result in a worthwhile change.
fast reply ;-)

Tvad, what would you suggest? A fuller sound compared to the Krell 300cx but with most of the bass control in place.

;-)
The Pass Labs XA-30.5 and XA-60.5 don't display the shortcomings in my system that you describe, and since I'm not familiar with your system, room or listening preferences, I can't offer an alternative based on experience.

Just for something to research...I've never heard the amplifier myself...you might do some reading about the new Modwright KWA 150.
Soren,
I have the XA100.5. I used to have the XA160. In my system, Eggleston speakers 87dB/6ohm, the 160s were a little slow/heavy in the bass as you describe. The XA100.5 has much faster, more articulate and defined bass and are better balanced overall. Great control over the woofers. The mids on voice and strings are exceptionally involving - lots of body and presence. I have not heard the XA30.5 or XA60.5. Matching a pre to Pass amps is very important. I auditioned a very well regarded tube preamp which sounded terrible in the bass region with my amps but great in other systems.
It's possible the output impedance of the Accuphase C-275 is too high for the XA-.5 series. This would possibly cause less than optimal bass performance from the Pass Labs amplifier. I couldn't find an impedance spec on the web for the C-275, however. Perhaps the owner's manual lists it.