What 6922's tubes are you using in your lamm s ?

Hello guys,

what 6922 tubes are you guys using on your lamm 2.1s and 1.1s ?
is it worth spending the extra amount on the nos 6922slike the ones from mullard, telefunken, etc ?

thanks for the inputs.

nolitan09-03-2008 9:40pm

...
16 posts total
View entire discussion

wavetrader Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 260 posts 09-04-2008 at 12:51am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Amperex 6922 D-getters late 1950's all i can say is WOW! The detail and soundstage is mindboggling vs the others. Expensive yes but .....
goldeneraguy Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 439 posts 09-04-2008 at 08:49pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete The 2492 tube is a step above the 6922.For really premium sound I find the 2493 even superior.Be sure they are really Mullard and made prior to mid 1970.I have used both in my LL2 with outstanding results.Sorry no experience with the 1.1 or 2.1 but these should do the trick. Enjoy
thomasheisig Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 568 posts 09-05-2008 at 08:53pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete The ML2.1 does not use 6922
goldeneraguy Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 439 posts 09-05-2008 at 10:30pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete In checking further.The 1.1 doesn't use the 6922 tube either. Hey Nolitan,whats the story ???
tvad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 9,467 posts 09-05-2008 at 10:46pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Maybe he means M1.2?

16 posts total
View entire discussion

More to discover