1. Home
  2. amps-preamps
  3. 1225925047

Which would you pick between these 2 and why?

I'm looking for opinions between these 2 products and why you'd choose it. I've owned quite a few amps including some Bryston.
I realize all the other associated components contribute in a big way, but all things being equal...

My current choice would be:

a) Bryston 3B ST

OR

b) McCormack DNA-125

Looking for some opinions

I prefer lots of detail but at the same time not the grain

Thanks for your input
audioknob
tvad
9,467 posts
 
Well, IMO, the Bryston has more detail, but the McCormack has less grain. Always a trade-off...

I'm sure you're aware the McCormack can be upgraded by Steve.
soix
2,133 posts
 
There's a review of the Bryston BP-6 preamp in Soundstage this month that contains a sidebar review of the Bryston 2B-SST compared to a McCormack DNA-0.5 Rev. A. Not apples to apples exactly with the two you're looking at, but might give you an idea of the general flavor differences of the brands and which might suit you best.
tpsonic
1,092 posts
 
I prefer the less-electronic sound of the McCormick gear-just my two cents.
unsound
6,115 posts
 
As you've already noted, but, perhaps have underappreciated "other associated components contribute in a big way". With that said, as far a preference for "lots of detail but at the same time not the grain" I think the McCormack might edge out the Bryston. I would still choose the Bryston over the McCormack with certain speakers, and visa/versa.
entrope
482 posts
 
The McCormack has finesse I feel that the Bryston lacks. I always felt my DNA-1 delivered music that flowed. Easy to listen to & smooth. My experience with Bryston - a good amp- left with a feeling of a slightly harder edge and a bit more in your face.

As stated previously associate gear makes a world difference and the other components in the systems I listen to were different.

.02
More to discover