Audio Research Ref 3 vs Atma-Sphere MP-1 mkIII

I have.

In my system, driving Pass Labs amps in balanced mode, the Atma-Sphere
MP-1 MKIII was a better match...resulting in a much larger image (which I
like), and a more lifelike, dynamic reproduction.

I'd say the ARC Ref3 was the more tonally neutral of the two, if that's a
priority.

FWIW, both were replaced with a Lamm L2 Reference, which has the neutrality
of the ARC married with the dynamics and life of the Atma-Sphere.

Grant, if you wouldn't mind, could you expand on your comment that the Atma-Sphere presented a "much larger image"?
The reason I ask is that I have heard this phrase many times, and IME, it usually means a more forward soundstage. A wider and higher soundstage, but at the sacrifice of depth.

FWIW, depth is a priority to me, I like a deeper 3-D soundstage as opposed to the more forward, larger 2-D stage. I do realize that everyone has different tastes though.

Cheers,
John

The image was higher and wider, which is what I meant by larger. Depth was
about equal, as I recall, and it could be adjusted with positioning of the
speakers (closer together and/or more toe-in produces a deeper image in my
system...and a small amount does it).

I believe it's fair to say that in my system, the Atma-Sphere put the listener
closer to the front of the concert hall than did the ARC Ref 3.

Thanks Grant, that does clarify certain things.

I prefer a more laid back, or mid-hall perspective as opposed to the "in your face" front row perspective.

I know that I differ from others who love the front row view, so thank you for clarifying what you meant Grant.

Cheers,
John