Class D question...............


Do you consider class D amps neutral or sweet sounding???
gvickerschtick
hey guidocorona. yeah, the question is quite broad, but i was wondering if a class d amp had an inherent sound, regardless of design. like how tube designs, to me, are musically warped or colored in a sweet way. i've just heard repeated comments as to the sweet/smooth top end of class d designs.

thanks everyone for your input and time.

merry xmas

kory
Either the future is already here or it's later than it's ever been.

There is at least one class D amp that is extremely neutral. Translation: extremely musical.

Can't speak for any other class d amp.

-IMO
...every person has personal listening preferences and cues, but most important...we all hear differently. Our ears and brain do not respond exactly as the person sitting next to us.

Audiofeil (Threads | Answers)
I agree 100%.

If more people kept this perspective in mind, there would be far less contentiousness in these threads.

Happy New Year.
kory, there is a lot of variability in class D, but I'll try to answer never the less. As a group, class D amps seem to be quite linear through the frequency range. They tend to lack obvious empasized areas from the midrange down to the low bass. . . on the other hand, in olden days -- that means for models that are more than a couple of years old -- there was a tendency in more than some class D amps to sound 'matter of fact, with only moderate harmonic development and with less than stellar microdynamics. The result was at times more outwardly impressive than ultimately musical. In more recent times deesigners have been evolving topologies that have addressed such limitations. . . often by regulating the power supplies and by preconverting the AC to DC even upstream of the power supply with a variety of techniques. The more successful devices now are not only very linear top to bottom, have excellent bass authority, dynamics staging, imaging. . . but also possess excellent harmonic texture, extremely subtle micro dynamics, detail, and a very extended and 'musical' treble and bass. Some designs are very successful. . . while others may be just a little less.

Merry Christmas everyone! G.
Martin Colloms addressed the question of class D amps in a recent HIFICRITIC. He concluded that their designers were ignoring factors that had always been considered important, listing 19 of them. He concluded, among other things:

What this means:
􀂄I consider that elements of the audio industry have exaggerated the need for High Fidelity enthusiasts to adopt ‘Class D’ amplification.
􀂄
The claimed efficiency advantage is largely valueless except to save for heat sinks for very large sub woofer amplifiers.
􀂄
High frequency and radio frequency noise is a vital issue and has not been sufficiently addressed with Class D designs. Class D amplifiers conduct and radiate substantial wide frequency range noise, both correlated and de-correlated.
􀂄
We know that high frequency noise degrades both the sound quality of the connected audio system and the amplifier itself.
HIFICRITIC:Are Class ‘D’ Amplifiers High Fidelity?

Other parts of this are on the HIFICRITIC web site.