Opinions on vintage cj amps and Teflon cap mods


I'm seeking opinions on having a vintage amp modified/updated. While I'm enjoying my conrad johnson Premier V as is, I can hear some significant differences when compared to some of the more modern amps I've heard. In my opinion, the sound I'm getting from my system is too soft, particularly the leading edge of notes and the upper base/lower mids. Decay, air, ambiance and overall musicality are great IMO. conrad johnson is offering modifications to the Premier 4&5 amplifiers which would include a new power supply and Teflon capacitors. What's crucial to me, is that I'm looking to improve the amplifiers performance, not just change it. The cj person I talked with said they've modified a couple of the Premier 4s with "smashing success". Thanks in advance for your experiences and opinions.
phaelon
I had a chance to compare CJ's proprietary teflon Caps to VH Audio and Relcap teflon caps as coupling caps in a tube preamp.
CJ's caps do not sound at all like VH caps. Both are excellent, the CJ caps retain the CJ "magic" while increasing resolution, however they do not go over the edge.
VH caps are excellent choices if your aim is maximum transparency.
The Relcap TFT cap would be my third choice.
In summary, if you want to bring your amp to modern CJ specs, I believe you can not go wrong with the factory mod.

Phaelon, most vintage tube amplifiers (not CJ) were designed to a price point and to make the tubes last long (to the detriment of sound quality). Tubes were under-biased (or to put it technically, an "easy-on-the-tubes", low current operating point was chosen), transformers had limited bandwidth, oil caps were used for coupling and the power supplies used a minimum of capacitance, mostly electrolytic caps have a specified shelf life of 10 years.

With rare exceptions (Harman Kardon, Fisher, Marantz, Quad), the output transformers did not pass a wide frequency response. This was partly compensated through heavy use of negative feedback, which wreaks havoc with soundstaging and dynamics.
In summary, vintage tube amplifiers in mint condition sound mellow, limited in the frequency extremes and undynamic as compared to modern tube amps. Soundstaging is also affected.
If one factors in dry power supply caps, out-of-spec resistors due to 30+ years of aging and leaky coupling caps, we have the usual mellow/bloated, lo-definition sound quality of vintage amps.
I am not saying that all vintage amps sound bad, I have tried to explain in general the "vintage sound"

SNS, about parts life expectation: Parts with a limited life span are tubes, potentiometers, carbon resistors and electrolytic caps.
Nowadays, CJ uses mostly film caps in their power supplies.

Transformers, hook-up wire, modern resistors, modern film capacitors, connectors and well-engineered tube sockets have an indefinite life span. 100 years in a non-salty/corrosive environment is not unheard of.
I own a 1938 tube radio that works perfecly after the electrolytic caps were replaced.
So, a properly cared-for CJ amp should last the owner's lifetime, if he/she replaces the output tubes when the bias indicator sez so.
Input tubes last aproximately 10,000 hours or 5-8 years of normal usage.

I hope this helps
Casouza, I hear you on the V-Caps, can be too much of a good thing, the reason I would hesitate to recommend them in this case. I wonder who manufacturers CJ's film caps?

Granting that what you say about transformers being band limited is true (I hear it), it would seem somewhat pointless to upgrade most vintage amps. These amps will never be able to reproduce those things I most like about the modern amp sound (I don't know about Phaelon), ie. the dynamics, immediacy and soundstaging. These things my Art Audio does magnificently, my CJ likely doesn't have a hope in these areas.
Hi Casouza, Your post helps tremendously. You addressed all of the issues in question. Ultimately, I have to make a decision and it would seem to come down to this: 1) Would I be better off trying to restore these amps to as close to original spec as possible, 2)sell them, combining the revenue with the cost of the upgrade and buy a different amp or 3)taking a chance on the upgrade and hope that lightening strikes. Regardless of which I choose, your post is most appreciated. They all are.
Hi Phaelon, thanks for your kind words.
I really can not answer your doubts, having no experience with your particular model CJ amp, however, if you like and enjoy your system as it is today, the upgrade will certainly be an incremental improvement across-the-board, because power supplies and coupling caps DO matter. Capacitor technology has evolved a lot in the past 10 years.
Reminder: give teflon caps 200-300 hours of play to sound their best. Initially, things may sound a bit weird.

If you are not happy with your system, then by all means "open the can of worms" AKA amplifier/speaker sinergy.

In the past five years, I went though several amplifiers: 50W SS, 200W SS, 400W SS, 500W SS (notice the power-race trend?), then 90 W McIntosh tube amp ...to end up with a measly 20 Watts Hyperion SET tube amp...now I am as happy as a kid in a candy store.

Sns, CJ capacitors are custom-made by CEC in the USA.
I recently bought a pair of cj prem 8a's and had conrad johnson do the teflon cap upgrade.

The upgrade consisted of replacing the eight coupling capacitors (inverter to output tubes) with .15 uF Teflon capacitors and replacing 6 more capacitors (four in the regulated supplies, two in the unregulated main supply) with .15 uF Teflon. Filament diodes were replaced with "beefier" diodes

No downside whatsoever. Maintains the strengths of original prem 8a while adding transparancy, seperation and overall ease of delivery.

Highly recommended for any owner of older cj amplifiers.