Balanced Low Power Tube Monoblocks?


I'm interested in suggestions for balanced, low power (let's say 60 wpc or less) tube monoblocks.

For example, the Atma-Sphere M-60.

Power tubes other than 300B are preferred (due to the high cost of NOS 300B tubes)

Others?
tvad
The Audio Mirror amps do seem like a good deal. Thanks for pointing them
out.

I decided to break the rules and buy a pair of single ended George Wright
Signature AU-15 monoblocks.

George made great, underrated stuff. I owned a WPP200C phono preamp,
and spoke with George on a few occasions. It was a bit of a sentimental
purchase.
Tvad, "It was a bit of a sentimental purchase."

Those are ALWAYS the best kind. Somehow, the music and enjoyment seems to transcend the equipment in these instances. Best of luck with the new babies Grant!
Grant -- Best of luck with the new amps.

Some approaches to consider if you want to try to find VINTAGE 2A3's, aside from the usual dealers who will of course charge very high prices when and if they have any for sale:

1)Take out a subscription to Antique Radio Classified, and run a free want ad there each month.

2)They were used in the power amplifier/power supply chassis of several very high end multi-chassis "radios" ca. 1935. Most notably, those made by E. H. Scott (no relation to H. H. Scott, the hifi manufacturer who came later). During the intervening 75 years, the power amp/power supply chassis have often become separated from the rest of the set, and sometimes appear for sale in ARC or on-line auctions. I found one via a local classified ad for $35 some years ago, complete with 4 good 2A3's. There were undoubtedly a lot of people in your particular neck of the woods who owned these sets, and some may still be sitting in basements, or become available through local auctions, tag sales, classifieds, etc.

The particular Scott sets which used 2A3's were the Allwave 15 and the Allwave 23, also known as the Allwave Imperial or Allwave High Fidelity.

3)The Brook amplifiers of the early 1950's (designed by Lincoln Walsh) commonly used 2A3's (sometimes 300B's), although they appear infrequently and usually command high prices.

Regards,
-- Al
Almarg, No, I don't seem to agree. The issue is that tube amplifiers are not always going to act like a true voltage source (that is the domain of transistors). You *can* get tubes to *start* to behave like a voltage source if you add enough feedback, but then IMO/IME, by doing so you obviate the main reason to go with tubes, which is linearity without feedback.

The problem with feedback is that it will *increase* the odd-ordered harmonics that the human ear uses to determine the volume of a sound. Since these harmonics are considerably higher in frequency (5th, 7th and 9th harmonics specifically) they also add an electronic brightness that everyone on this forum is very familiar with. Nelson Pass wrote a great article about this:

http://www.passlabs.com/pdf/articles/distortion_and_feedback.pdf

pay particular attention to the graph showing the odd orders.

So IOW we as audiophiles are always having to decide between sound that might not be perfectly flat but otherwise sounds natural *or* sound that measures flat but sounds hard and bright! Either way there is a coloration and either way neither one sounds like the frequency response is flat.

I for one prefer highs that are natural as opposed to bright. I don't like boomy bass or anemic bass either, so I choose speakers wherein the designer knew that the amplifier driving that speaker was not going to be a perfect 'voltage source'. see

http://www.atma-sphere.com/papers/paradigm_paper2.html

for what that is all about.