Mark Levinson 23.5: camac or RCA?

If you check the Manual for the 23.5 you will see that they state you should do it the way I stated above, also from what I remember regarding the 23.5 that amp did not come with Camac connectors, but I could be wrong. its been a long time since I had that amp but I do know Krell (which is my present amp)does it the same way. and I think Ayre amps as well.

So, Moemoney,

in this case I think my best bet would be to replace the camac with RCA'S ON THE AMP, if I want to keep my Colorado's - since Microchip says they are not suitable for conversion (and I agree).

Is the replacement of the camac with RCA's the solution whuch will give me the bst sound possible? - I'm not ready to make a compromise let say to keep the amp. as is, or because it is "too much trouble" to make a change that will have "just" a minimal negative effect (there is no such thing as a "minimal negative")

Tab110s,

so you listened to the 23.5 with RCAs and camac and you are saying the RCA were sounding better?

Thank all of you for all past answers and in advance for the next ones. All this info is of great help in my search.

Camac / Lemo connectors are used in nuclear and laboratory instrumentation mainly because they are small and reliable and can be inserted and picked easily many thousands times.
The same hardware that costed a few bucks for laboratories was sold for audiophiles at much higher price. Although there is no firm evidence that they sound better than other audio plugs, they do not break the earth path before the signal one and are self-locking.

To clarify matters, Levinson used single pin Lemos for unbalanced signals, Cello used Camac three pin ones for balanced signals and Krell uses four pin Camacs for cast (current mode) signals.

If you do not mind the extra work and mutilating the original back plate, fitting a RCA connector to the amp is the best solution. But if you accept that a Cardas RCA plug sounds different from a Neutrik the choice is not easy ...